It should be possible for an abuse report to be cryptographically self-signed by the issuer. (Including a timestamp.)
This will allow the report to be republished with provable connection to the issuer.
If the issuer is well known, this reputation would be used in the report.
It should be possible for an abuse report to be cryptographically self-signed by the issuer. (Including a timestamp.)
This will allow the report to be republished with provable connection to the issuer.
If the issuer is well known, this reputation would be used in the report.