Conversation
feat: fixed weird timing issue
![github-actions[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/15368?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
| <ReviewRow | ||
| name="Multisend Address" | ||
| value={ | ||
| <Typography> | ||
| {data.multisendAddress} | ||
| </Typography> | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Replace ⏎··············name="Multisend·Address"⏎··············value={⏎················<Typography>⏎··················{data.multisendAddress}⏎················</Typography>⏎··············} with ·name="Multisend·Address"·value={<Typography>{data.multisendAddress}</Typography>}·/> prettier/prettier
Fix available:
| <ReviewRow | |
| name="Multisend Address" | |
| value={ | |
| <Typography> | |
| {data.multisendAddress} | |
| </Typography> | |
| } | |
| <ReviewRow name="Multisend Address" value={<Typography>{data.multisendAddress}</Typography>} /> |
| {data.multisendAddress} | ||
| </Typography> | ||
| } | ||
| />)} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
| value={ | ||
| <Typography> | ||
| {data.multisendCallOnlyAddress} | ||
| </Typography> | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Replace ⏎················<Typography>⏎··················{data.multisendCallOnlyAddress}⏎················</Typography>⏎·············· with <Typography>{data.multisendCallOnlyAddress}</Typography> prettier/prettier
Fix available:
| value={ | |
| <Typography> | |
| {data.multisendCallOnlyAddress} | |
| </Typography> | |
| } | |
| value={<Typography>{data.multisendCallOnlyAddress}</Typography>} |
| {data.multisendCallOnlyAddress} | ||
| </Typography> | ||
| } | ||
| />)} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
| const { chainId, address, owners, threshold, multisendAddress, multisendCallOnlyAddress } = payload.safe | ||
|
|
||
| state[chainId] ??= {} | ||
| const existingData = state[chainId][address.value] ?? {}; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Delete ; prettier/prettier
Fix available:
| const existingData = state[chainId][address.value] ?? {}; | |
| const existingData = state[chainId][address.value] ?? {} |
Coverage report
Test suite run success761 tests passing in 120 suites. Report generated by 🧪jest coverage report action from 8be4b44 |
1 participant
What it solves
Resolves #
How this PR fixes it
How to test it
Screenshots
Checklist