Fixed PES

ParCoreLab · Apr 26, 2024 · 85548dc · 85548dc
1 parent 9efe8a8
commit 85548dc
Show file tree

Hide file tree

Showing 2 changed files with 1 addition and 1 deletion.
diff --git a/docs/PES-comparison.png → docs/assets/PES-comparison.png b/docs/PES-comparison.png → docs/assets/PES-comparison.png
diff --git a/docs/index.md b/docs/index.md
@@ -609,7 +609,7 @@ BeyondMoore Software Ecosystem
     <div clas="flex flex-col justify-start" style="width: 60%">
      <div class="flex flex-row gap-2 justify-start items-center flex-shrink">
     <img width="32" src="./assets/git.webp" />
-    <a href="/ParCoreLab/PES-artifact" class="text-xl font-semibold font-serif visited:text-teal-700">Percise Event Sampling</a>
+    <a href="/ParCoreLab/PES-artifact" class="text-xl font-semibold font-serif visited:text-teal-700">Precise Event Sampling</a>
     </div>
     <p class="text-lg">
     Precise event sampling, a profiling feature in commodity processors, accurately pinpoints instructions triggering hardware events. While widely utilized, support from vendors varies, impacting accuracy, stability, overhead, and functionality. Our study benchmarks Intel PEBS and AMD IBS, revealing PEBS's finer-grained accuracy and IBS's richer information but lower stability. PEBS incurs lower time overhead, while IBS suffers from accuracy issues. OS signal delivery adds significant time overhead. Both PEBS and IBS exhibit sampling bias. Our findings hold in a full-fledged profiling tool on modern Intel and AMD machines. This comparison offers valuable insights for hardware designers and profiling tool developers.  <a href="https://github.com/ParCoreLab/PES-artifact" class="text-xl font-semibold font-serif visited:text-teal-700">All the artifacts and benchmarks can be found.</a>