Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove Deprecated ESLint Config #2504

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Sep 2, 2024

Conversation

GlenDsza
Copy link

@GlenDsza GlenDsza commented Sep 2, 2024

What kind of change does this PR introduce?

bugfix

Issue Number:

Fixes #2496

Did you add tests for your changes?

Yes

Summary

Suggested by typescript-eslint docs

Removed:
@typescript-eslint/ban-types: This rule has been deprecated and removed in TypeScript ESLint v8.

Added:
@typescript-eslint/no-empty-object-type: Enforces banning the built-in {} type in confusing locations.
@typescript-eslint/no-unsafe-function-type: Enforces banning the built-in Function type.
@typescript-eslint/no-wrapper-object-types: Enforces banning built-in class wrappers such as Number.

Does this PR introduce a breaking change?

No

Have you read the contributing guide?

Yes

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated TypeScript linting rules to enhance type safety and code quality.
    • Minor formatting adjustments made for improved readability in the configuration file.
  • Documentation
    • Minor edit in the README.md to remove an unnecessary line, maintaining the overall content structure.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 2, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes involve updating the ESLint configuration to remove deprecated rules and introduce new ones that enhance type safety in TypeScript. Specifically, the deprecated @typescript-eslint/ban-types rule has been replaced with three new rules focused on enforcing stricter checks on function and object types. Additionally, minor formatting adjustments were made to improve readability in the configuration files.

Changes

Files Change Summary
.eslintrc.json Removed @typescript-eslint/ban-types and added @typescript-eslint/no-unsafe-function-type, @typescript-eslint/no-wrapper-object-types, and @typescript-eslint/no-empty-object-type. Minor formatting adjustments made.
README.md Removed a line containing a hyphen, with no other content changes.

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Remove deprecated @typescript-eslint/ban-types rule (#[2496])
Add new rules: @typescript-eslint/no-empty-object-type, @typescript-eslint/no-unsafe-function-type, and @typescript-eslint/no-wrapper-object-types (#[2496])

🐰 Hopping through the code so bright,
With new rules to make our types just right.
Old ones gone, the path is clear,
Safety and clarity, we hold dear!
Let's celebrate with a joyful cheer! 🎉


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.
Early access features: disabled

We are currently testing the following features in early access:

  • Anthropic claude-3-5-sonnet for code reviews: Anthropic claims that the new Claude model has stronger code understanding and code generation capabilities than their previous models. Note: Our default code review model was also updated late last week. Please compare the quality of the reviews between the two models by toggling the early access feature.

Note:

  • You can enable or disable early access features from the CodeRabbit UI or by updating the CodeRabbit configuration file.
  • Please join our Discord Community to provide feedback and report issues on the discussion post.

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Sep 2, 2024

Our Pull Request Approval Process

We have these basic policies to make the approval process smoother for our volunteer team.

Testing Your Code

Please make sure your code passes all tests. Our test code coverage system will fail if these conditions occur:

  1. The overall code coverage drops below the target threshold of the repository
  2. Any file in the pull request has code coverage levels below the repository threshold
  3. Merge conflicts

The process helps maintain the overall reliability of the code base and is a prerequisite for getting your PR approved. Assigned reviewers regularly review the PR queue and tend to focus on PRs that are passing.

Reviewers

Do not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
When your PR has been assigned reviewers contact them to get your code reviewed and approved via:

  1. comments in this PR or
  2. our slack channel

Reviewing Your Code

Your reviewer(s) will have the following roles:

  1. arbitrators of future discussions with other contributors about the validity of your changes
  2. point of contact for evaluating the validity of your work
  3. person who verifies matching issues by others that should be closed.
  4. person who gives general guidance in fixing your tests

CONTRIBUTING.md

Read our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:

  1. PRs with issues not assigned to you will be closed by the reviewer
  2. Fix the first comment in the PR so that each issue listed automatically closes

Other

  1. 🎯 Please be considerate of our volunteers' time. Contacting the person who assigned the reviewers is not advised unless they ask for your input. Do not @ the person who did the assignment otherwise.
  2. Read the CONTRIBUTING.md file make

@GlenDsza
Copy link
Author

GlenDsza commented Sep 2, 2024

@palisadoes @tasneemkoushar Pls review and merge as its a blocker for raising any other PRs in API

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 534ade4 and 4ad69c1.

Files selected for processing (2)
  • .eslintrc.json (2 hunks)
  • README.md (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • README.md
Additional comments not posted (4)
.eslintrc.json (4)

113-115: LGTM: Removal of deprecated rule.

The removal of the deprecated @typescript-eslint/ban-types rule is necessary to align with the latest TypeScript ESLint version. The PR summary and linked issue provide sufficient context for this change.


113-113: LGTM: Addition of new rule to enhance type safety.

The addition of the @typescript-eslint/no-unsafe-function-type rule is a suitable replacement for the deprecated @typescript-eslint/ban-types rule. It enhances type safety by prohibiting the use of the built-in Function type, aligning with the objective of improving code quality and maintainability.


114-114: LGTM: Addition of new rule to enhance type safety.

The addition of the @typescript-eslint/no-wrapper-object-types rule is a suitable replacement for the deprecated @typescript-eslint/ban-types rule. It enhances type safety by banning the use of built-in class wrappers like Number, aligning with the objective of improving code quality and maintainability.


115-115: LGTM: Addition of new rule to enhance type safety.

The addition of the @typescript-eslint/no-empty-object-type rule is a suitable replacement for the deprecated @typescript-eslint/ban-types rule. It enhances type safety by banning the use of the built-in {} type in potentially confusing contexts, aligning with the objective of improving code quality and maintainability.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 2, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 98.90%. Comparing base (2bd7ea0) to head (499a718).
Report is 1 commits behind head on develop.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##           develop    #2504   +/-   ##
========================================
  Coverage    98.90%   98.90%           
========================================
  Files          357      357           
  Lines        18013    18013           
  Branches      2400     2400           
========================================
  Hits         17815    17815           
  Misses         195      195           
  Partials         3        3           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@palisadoes palisadoes merged commit 95597d7 into PalisadoesFoundation:develop Sep 2, 2024
10 of 11 checks passed
@GlenDsza GlenDsza deleted the fix_eslint_config branch September 4, 2024 19:16
AnshulKahar2729 pushed a commit to AnshulKahar2729/talawa-api that referenced this pull request Sep 18, 2024
* remove deprecated ban-types

* remove auto readme changes

* revert readme
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants