Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Updated typescript to latest #2246

Conversation

adithyanotfound
Copy link

@adithyanotfound adithyanotfound commented Sep 6, 2024

Issue Number:

Fixes #2016

Did you add tests for your changes?

Not required.

Does this PR introduce a breaking change?

No.

Have you read the contributing guide?

Yes

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Upgraded TypeScript dependency to version 4.9.5, which may enhance performance and introduce new features or bug fixes.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 6, 2024

Walkthrough

The primary change involves upgrading the typescript dependency in the package.json file from version ^4.3.5 to ^4.9.5. This update may introduce new features, improvements, or bug fixes that could impact the project's functionality and compatibility.

Changes

Files Change Summary
package.json Updated typescript version from ^4.3.5 to ^4.9.5

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Upgrade TypeScript (2016)
Address Dependency Issues (2016) No evidence of resolving conflicts mentioned.
Codebase Updates (2016) Unclear if codebase updates for new syntax were made.
Release Note Awareness (2016) No indication of review of release notes.

Poem

🐇
In fields of code, I hop and play,
With TypeScript's upgrade, hip-hip-hooray!
New features bloom, like flowers in spring,
A joyful leap, oh, what joy they bring!
With every change, I dance and twirl,
In the world of code, watch my whiskers whirl! 🌼


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Sep 6, 2024

Our Pull Request Approval Process

We have these basic policies to make the approval process smoother for our volunteer team.

Testing Your Code

Please make sure your code passes all tests. Our test code coverage system will fail if these conditions occur:

  1. The overall code coverage drops below the target threshold of the repository
  2. Any file in the pull request has code coverage levels below the repository threshold
  3. Merge conflicts

The process helps maintain the overall reliability of the code base and is a prerequisite for getting your PR approved. Assigned reviewers regularly review the PR queue and tend to focus on PRs that are passing.

Reviewers

Do not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
When your PR has been assigned reviewers contact them to get your code reviewed and approved via:

  1. comments in this PR or
  2. our slack channel

Reviewing Your Code

Your reviewer(s) will have the following roles:

  1. arbitrators of future discussions with other contributors about the validity of your changes
  2. point of contact for evaluating the validity of your work
  3. person who verifies matching issues by others that should be closed.
  4. person who gives general guidance in fixing your tests

CONTRIBUTING.md

Read our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:

  1. PRs with issues not assigned to you will be closed by the reviewer
  2. Fix the first comment in the PR so that each issue listed automatically closes

Other

  1. 🎯 Please be considerate of our volunteers' time. Contacting the person who assigned the reviewers is not advised unless they ask for your input. Do not @ the person who did the assignment otherwise.
  2. Read the CONTRIBUTING.md file make

@adithyanotfound adithyanotfound marked this pull request as draft September 6, 2024 18:34
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between fbce25b and 220cfd6.

Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • package-lock.json is excluded by !**/package-lock.json
Files selected for processing (1)
  • package.json (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (1)
package.json (1)

58-58: Approved TypeScript version update.

The update from ^4.3.5 to ^5.5.4 is correctly implemented. This upgrade should allow the use of new features and improvements in TypeScript 5.5.4.

Please ensure to run the project build and check for any compatibility issues with the new TypeScript version. If needed, review TypeScript 5.5.4 release notes for any potential breaking changes that might affect the project.

Would you like assistance in setting up or running these checks?

coderabbitai[bot]
coderabbitai bot previously approved these changes Sep 6, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 7, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 97.50%. Comparing base (fbce25b) to head (76341b0).

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##           develop    #2246   +/-   ##
========================================
  Coverage    97.50%   97.50%           
========================================
  Files          247      247           
  Lines         7062     7062           
  Branches      2025     2033    +8     
========================================
  Hits          6886     6886           
  Misses         162      162           
  Partials        14       14           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@adithyanotfound
Copy link
Author

adithyanotfound commented Sep 7, 2024

CRA (create-react-app) only supports up to TypeScript version 4.9.5. For better TypeScript compatibility and potential performance benefits, migrating to Vite or preferably Next.js is recommended. If you want me to migrate to Vite please assign Issue #1864.

NOTE: Migrating to Vite may introduce a few issues in deployment that you'll need to address. For now, you could continue using CRA and wait for a future update that supports newer TypeScript versions.

@adithyanotfound adithyanotfound marked this pull request as ready for review September 7, 2024 04:26
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 220cfd6 and 76341b0.

Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • package-lock.json is excluded by !**/package-lock.json
Files selected for processing (1)
  • package.json (1 hunks)

@Cioppolo14
Copy link

There isn’t an issue assigned to you for this PR. Please follow the guidelines in our PR_GUIDELINES.md file. We have the procedures in place so that everyone has a fair chance of contributing. I will be closing this pull request. Please follow the procedures and resubmit when ready.

@Cioppolo14 Cioppolo14 closed this Sep 7, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants