Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix the loading state #2177

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Aug 17, 2024

Conversation

AnshulKahar2729
Copy link

@AnshulKahar2729 AnshulKahar2729 commented Aug 15, 2024

What kind of change does this PR introduce?

feature

Issue Number:

Fixes #2110

Did you add tests for your changes?

No.

Snapshots/Videos:

login_loading_bug_fix.mp4

Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
No

Have you read the contributing guide?
Yes

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Enhanced user experience by disabling form controls and buttons during loading states to prevent unintended interactions.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Simplified loading state management, improving responsiveness and clarity during the login process.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Aug 15, 2024

Walkthrough

The updates to the LoginPage.tsx enhance user experience during login and registration processes by implementing a more intuitive handling of loading states. The form fields are now disabled during the loading phase, preventing user interaction and potential errors. The changes simplify the loading condition checks and improve the overall responsiveness of the interface, ensuring that users remain aware of ongoing actions without losing sight of the form.

Changes

File Change Summary
src/screens/LoginPage/LoginPage.tsx Added disabled attribute to form controls and buttons based on loading states; simplified logic for loading conditions.

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Disable Form on Submit (#2110)
Dim Background (#2110) Changes do not include background dimming.
Top Loader Indicator (#2110) No implementation of a loader at the top.

Poem

🐇 In fields of code where bunnies play,
A login form brightens the day.
With fields now locked, no clicks will roam,
As loaders whirl, we feel right at home.
A smoother path for all to see,
Hooray for changes, joyous and free! 🌼


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

Our Pull Request Approval Process

We have these basic policies to make the approval process smoother for our volunteer team.

Testing Your Code

Please make sure your code passes all tests. Our test code coverage system will fail if these conditions occur:

  1. The overall code coverage drops below the target threshold of the repository
  2. Any file in the pull request has code coverage levels below the repository threshold
  3. Merge conflicts

The process helps maintain the overall reliability of the code base and is a prerequisite for getting your PR approved. Assigned reviewers regularly review the PR queue and tend to focus on PRs that are passing.

Reviewers

Do not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
When your PR has been assigned reviewers contact them to get your code reviewed and approved via:

  1. comments in this PR or
  2. our slack channel

Reviewing Your Code

Your reviewer(s) will have the following roles:

  1. arbitrators of future discussions with other contributors about the validity of your changes
  2. point of contact for evaluating the validity of your work
  3. person who verifies matching issues by others that should be closed.
  4. person who gives general guidance in fixing your tests

CONTRIBUTING.md

Read our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:

  1. PRs with issues not assigned to you will be closed by the reviewer
  2. Fix the first comment in the PR so that each issue listed automatically closes

Other

  1. 🎯 Please be considerate of our volunteers' time. Contacting the person who assigned the reviewers is not advised unless they ask for your input. Do not @ the person who did the assignment otherwise.
  2. Read the CONTRIBUTING.md file make

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between d36ec71 and 82bea98.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/screens/LoginPage/LoginPage.tsx (10 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (7)
src/screens/LoginPage/LoginPage.tsx (7)

432-432: LGTM!

The disabled attribute for the email field is conditionally set based on loginLoading, preventing interaction during the login process.


469-469: LGTM!

The disabled attribute for the password field is conditionally set based on loginLoading, preventing interaction during the login process.


509-509: LGTM!

The disabled attribute for the submit button is conditionally set based on loginLoading, preventing multiple submissions during the login process.


550-550: LGTM!

The disabled attribute for the first name field is conditionally set based on signinLoading, preventing interaction during the registration process.


570-570: LGTM!

The disabled attribute for the last name field is conditionally set based on signinLoading, preventing interaction during the registration process.


856-856: LGTM!

The disabled attribute for the submit button is conditionally set based on signinLoading, preventing multiple submissions during the registration process.


339-341: Verify the simplified loading condition.

The conditional check for loading states now only includes componentLoader, recaptchaLoading, and loading. Ensure that this simplification aligns with the intended behavior and that no other loading states are required.

Verification successful

Simplified loading condition is appropriate.

The conditional check using componentLoader, recaptchaLoading, and loading correctly determines when to display the loading indicator. This aligns with the intended behavior of managing loading states in the application.

  • componentLoader: Used to manage component-specific loading state.
  • recaptchaLoading: Tied to the loading state of the reCAPTCHA mutation.
  • loading: Associated with the loading state of a data query.
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that the simplified loading condition aligns with the intended behavior.

# Test: Search for all loading state variables. Expect: Only `componentLoader`, `recaptchaLoading`, and `loading` are used in conditional checks.
rg --type js 'loading' -A 3

Length of output: 27


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for the usage of `componentLoader`, `recaptchaLoading`, and `loading` in the LoginPage.tsx file.

# Find the file path for LoginPage.tsx
file_path=$(fd 'LoginPage.tsx')

# Search for the usage of the specified loading state variables within the file
rg 'componentLoader|recaptchaLoading|loading' -A 3 "$file_path"

Length of output: 990

coderabbitai[bot]
coderabbitai bot previously approved these changes Aug 15, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 15, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 97.57%. Comparing base (a3c3555) to head (6a10083).
Report is 2 commits behind head on develop.

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop    #2177      +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage    97.57%   97.57%   -0.01%     
===========================================
  Files          241      241              
  Lines         6857     6848       -9     
  Branches      1993     1985       -8     
===========================================
- Hits          6691     6682       -9     
  Misses         151      151              
  Partials        15       15              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Contributor

@palisadoes palisadoes left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

  1. Is this necessary? Are we adding code we don't really need?
  2. For example, if logging in doesn't have a loading screen, then we'll need to remove it for every screen selected for logout. There is no user experience consistency

AnshulKahar2729

This comment was marked as outdated.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 82bea98 and 6a10083.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/screens/LoginPage/LoginPage.tsx (13 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • src/screens/LoginPage/LoginPage.tsx

@AnshulKahar2729
Copy link
Author

  1. Is this necessary? Are we adding code we don't really need?
  2. For example, if logging in doesn't have a loading screen, then we'll need to remove it for every screen selected for logout. There is no user experience consistency

I think the login form one is pretty standard, you will be able to see it everywhere because people try out different credentials many times and you can't show that big loading screen every time for that, but for other stuff, you can. Talking about consistency, maintaining a different loading mechanism could also be a sign of consistency, we can implement that in every form out there, and for the rest of the things, loader will make sense. Let me know, what you think, I will accordingly make the changes.

Copy link
Author

@AnshulKahar2729 AnshulKahar2729 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Done

@palisadoes
Copy link
Contributor

I'll approve this as most websites follow this design aesthetic, however we must not eliminate the loading page anywhere else. We have other more important areas to focus on, such as reducing our code bloat and the resulting high memory utilization.

@palisadoes palisadoes merged commit c34c2c7 into PalisadoesFoundation:develop Aug 17, 2024
12 checks passed
@AnshulKahar2729 AnshulKahar2729 deleted the loginLoading branch August 17, 2024 14:09
@AnshulKahar2729
Copy link
Author

I'll approve this as most websites follow this design aesthetic, however we must not eliminate the loading page anywhere else. We have other more important areas to focus on, such as reducing our code bloat and the resulting high memory utilization.

Yes sure and I'll try to contribute to more serious issues next time. This was my first time contributing to the talawa, so I picked an easier one.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants