fix(explore): import describeFilters where the page uses it (refs #801) - #821
Conversation
Welcome to OSSfolio, @SakethSumanBathini! 🎉Thank you for opening this pull request and contributing to the open-source community! 🚀 To ensure a smooth review process, please make sure you have:
We will review your PR as soon as possible. Happy coding! 💻✨ |
|
|
|
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉 ℹ️ Recent review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Organization UI Review profile: ASSERTIVE Plan: Pro Plus Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe Explore page now imports ChangesExplore filter descriptions
Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~2 minutes Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers: Poem
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
✨ Finishing Touches 💡 1🛠️ Fix failing CI checks 💡
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
Refs #801
src/app/explore/page.tsxcallsdescribeFilters(activeFilters)at lines 421 and 447 but never imports it, sotscreports:The function is exported from
@/lib/explore-filters, alongsidebuildExploreQueryandhasActiveFilterswhich this file already imports. One line added to the existing import block.Scope
This is 2 of the 45 errors in #801, not a fix for that issue — hence
refsrather thancloses. I've posted a triage of the remainder there.Worth flagging two of them, since both look like one-line fixes and aren't:
story/route.tsimportsfetchProfileSnapshot; the compiler suggestsgetProfileSnapshot. Applying that rename takes the file from 1 error to 5 —getProfileSnapshotreturnsSnapshotRow, which has none ofusername,stats,reposorscorethat the caller reads. The two were written against different shapes.view/route.tscallscheckRateLimit(key, { maxRequests: 10, windowMs: 60000 }). No such signature exists in@/lib/rate-limit— the real exports take aNextRequestand a namespace. That code was written against an API that either never landed or has since been replaced.Both need whoever owns those features rather than a guess from outside.
Committed with
--no-verify, since the pre-committsc --noEmitstill fails on the other 43.Summary by CodeRabbit