A comment at function `_nonReentrantBefore()` in `ReentrancyGuardTransientUpgradeable` is misleading

[gpersoon]

A comment at function _nonReentrantBefore() in ReentrancyGuardTransientUpgradeable is misleading.

💻 Environment
ReentrancyGuardTransientUpgradeable.sol

Latest version of the code, also present in release-v5.2

📝 Details
The following comment is present in ReentrancyGuardTransientUpgradeable.sol#L47:

     // On the first call to nonReentrant, _status will be NOT_ENTERED

As everyone knows, NOT_ENTERED has the value of 1, see ReentrancyGuardUpgradeable.sol#L38:

uint256 private constant NOT_ENTERED = 1;

However in ReentrancyGuardTransientUpgradeable the initial value will be 0 or false.
Also _status isn't present in the code.

Suggested solution
Consider changing the code to something like:

-// On the first call to nonReentrant, _status will be NOT_ENTERED
+// On the first call to nonReentrant, REENTRANCY_GUARD_STORAGE.asBoolean().tload() will be false

🔢 Code to reproduce bug
NA

[ernestognw]

This is correct. There's no _status in ReentrancyGuardTransient.

Thanks for reporting, I'm opening a PR