Skip to content

Bump minimal required Ruby from 2.5->3.2#6

Merged
jessereynolds merged 1 commit intoOpenVoxProject:mainfrom
bastelfreak:ruby
Jul 10, 2025
Merged

Bump minimal required Ruby from 2.5->3.2#6
jessereynolds merged 1 commit intoOpenVoxProject:mainfrom
bastelfreak:ruby

Conversation

@bastelfreak
Copy link
Contributor

@bastelfreak bastelfreak commented Jun 20, 2025

3.2 is the oldest and still maintained Ruby version.

@bastelfreak bastelfreak self-assigned this Jun 20, 2025
@bastelfreak bastelfreak added the backwards-incompatible This change will lead to a major version bump for the next release label Jun 20, 2025
@bastelfreak
Copy link
Contributor Author

Before we merge this I would like to figure out if this actually works on Ruby 2.7 or if we need to bump it to 3.2 (or if we even want to support 2.7/3.0).

@jessereynolds
Copy link
Contributor

Can we bump to 3.2 minimum? It’s the oldest ruby still in support. https://docs.ruby-lang.org/en/

@bastelfreak
Copy link
Contributor Author

I don't think we still need to pull in ancient rubies. We don't have Bolt consumers that are that ancient (like PE Orchestrator).

3.2 is the oldest and still maintained Ruby version.
@bastelfreak bastelfreak changed the title Bump minimal required Ruby from 2.5->2.7 Bump minimal required Ruby from 2.5->3.2 Jul 10, 2025
@jessereynolds jessereynolds merged commit 302ce0d into OpenVoxProject:main Jul 10, 2025
5 of 68 checks passed
@bastelfreak bastelfreak deleted the ruby branch July 10, 2025 15:22
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

backwards-incompatible This change will lead to a major version bump for the next release

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants