Skip to content

Conversation

@LukasGold
Copy link
Contributor

@SimonStier is this quicker than the implementation that we have inplace?

@simontaurus
Copy link
Contributor

I guess yes, because the initialization (=API-Call) of the page-to-delete is now within the parallel loop

@LukasGold LukasGold self-assigned this Nov 29, 2024
@LukasGold LukasGold added the enhancement New feature or request label Nov 29, 2024
@coveralls
Copy link

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 12080696497

Details

  • 2 of 15 (13.33%) changed or added relevant lines in 1 file are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage decreased (-0.07%) to 52.592%

Changes Missing Coverage Covered Lines Changed/Added Lines %
src/osw/wtsite.py 2 15 13.33%
Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 12068018800: -0.07%
Covered Lines: 2909
Relevant Lines: 5187

💛 - Coveralls

@LukasGold LukasGold merged commit d0dd170 into main Nov 29, 2024
9 checks passed
@LukasGold LukasGold deleted the alternative-delete_page branch November 29, 2024 08:11
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

enhancement New feature or request

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants