Skip to content

Separate packit job for release in EPEL 8 #153

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
evgenyz merged 2 commits into from
Apr 11, 2023
Merged

Separate packit job for release in EPEL 8 #153

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
c6be91b
Create separate job propose_downstream for EPEL8
Honny1 Mar 28, 2023
bc747f1
Sync tests with downstream
Honny1 Mar 28, 2023
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
9 changes: 9 additions & 0 deletions .packit.yaml
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -10,6 +10,8 @@ files_to_sync:
dest: plans/
- src: .fmf/
dest: .fmf/
- src: tests/
Copy link
Contributor

@evgenyz evgenyz Apr 6, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We haven't had to do that before. What's changed?

Copy link
Member Author

@Honny1 Honny1 Apr 6, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why didn't we have to do that? I think it was missing by mistake. Downstream CI tried to execute the tmt plan but could not find the test.

Copy link
Contributor

@evgenyz evgenyz Apr 11, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Does not look as it was not found: https://artifacts.dev.testing-farm.io/78e9d3cd-7980-472a-920e-1e7b4d6454ae/

Copy link
Contributor

@evgenyz evgenyz Apr 11, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Packit itself does not sync anything else as well: https://github.com/packit/packit/blob/8d661ceb831aacbf6ef39d186ec8ef850e800dad/.packit.yaml#L6

Copy link
Member Author

@Honny1 Honny1 Apr 11, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Does not look as it was not found: https://artifacts.dev.testing-farm.io/78e9d3cd-7980-472a-920e-1e7b4d6454ae/

PackIt finds tests because it uses a GitHub repository. For downstream is used downstream repo:
https://artifacts.dev.testing-farm.io/e0b683ea-6977-4e6f-b034-e6daf66ac1bd/

Copy link
Contributor

@evgenyz evgenyz Apr 11, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Got it.

Copy link
Member Author

@Honny1 Honny1 Apr 11, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I check how PackIt uses tmt etc. PackIt discovers tests from upstream. I will change it in another PR.

dest: tests/

# name in upstream package repository or registry (e.g. in PyPI)
upstream_package_name: openscap-report
Expand All @@ -34,8 +36,15 @@ actions:
jobs:
- job: propose_downstream
trigger: release
identifier: release-rawhide
dist_git_branches:
- fedora-rawhide

- job: propose_downstream
trigger: release
identifier: release-epel8
specfile_path: spec/rhel8/openscap-report.spec
dist_git_branches:
- epel-8

- job: tests
Expand Down