-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.6k
Fix BLAS, BLAS-like functions and Generic RISC-V kernels #4452
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix BLAS, BLAS-like functions and Generic RISC-V kernels #4452
Conversation
kseniyazaytseva
commented
Jan 24, 2024
- Fixed gemmt: Added explicit declarations of gemmt functions. Fixed problems associated with incorrect processing of complex conjugate matrices. Error output has also been corrected.
- Fixed CNC case of zimatcopy functions. In the case of alpha_r = 1.0 alpha_i = 0.0, need to perform the usual complex matrix conjugation
- Fixed imatcopy function memory allocation
- Fixed calling cblas_cscal testing in ctest
- Removed rotmg unreacheble code
- Added zero size checks
- Added axpby kernels for GENERIC RISC-V target
* Fixed gemmt, imatcopy, zimatcopy_cnc functions * Fixed cblas_cscal testing in ctest * Removed rotmg unreacheble code * Added zero size checks
…elong on the LAPACK list
Thanks - I believe that several of these were already fixed in the main |
Yes, the files For gemmt there are still no explicit declarations. The file |
Ah thanks, that's unfortunate - seems I never commited the changes to cblas.h - and there's no question that the implementation of the complex conjugate case is/was broken. |
BTW the CSCAL/CSCALTEST confusion in c_cblat1.f appears to be imported from https://github.com/Reference-LAPACK/lapack/blame/master/CBLAS/testing/c_cblat1.f - I wonder if you would like to open a PR there as well ? |
I agree that it should probably be fixed in Reference-LAPACK. But I'm just focused on OpenBLAS |
I can create an issue/PR in Reference-LAPACK no problem - I just wanted to make sure you do not want to do this yourself. |