Introduce multipart works#6310
Draft
fellowseb wants to merge 9 commits into
Draft
Conversation
…alling to_processed
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Proposed changes
Aftermath of the addition of the
is_multipartflag on theto_processedclient-python API. The intent is to better handle thecompletedstatus of works that use multiple bundles.is_multipart=Trueoptionto_processedin afinallyblock/!\ This work is still in draft as we may have identified a case that isn't handled well: the case where the worker does the bundle splitting itself.
Related issues
Checklist
Further comments