Set received count in interface_microservice and inject_tlm

[jmthomas]

closes #196
closes #183

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Base: 74.00% // Head: 74.09% // Increases project coverage by +0.09% 🎉

Coverage data is based on head (7af7b1b) compared to base (febdcf2).
Patch coverage: 100.00% of modified lines in pull request are covered.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #197      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   74.00%   74.09%   +0.09%     
==========================================
  Files         413      413              
  Lines       25567    25592      +25     
  Branches      559      559              
==========================================
+ Hits        18920    18963      +43     
+ Misses       6561     6544      -17     
+ Partials       86       85       -1     

Flag	Coverage Δ
frontend	75.75% <ø> (+0.14%)	⬆️
ruby-api	43.91% <ø> (ø)
ruby-backend	78.60% <100.00%> (+0.09%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
openc3/lib/openc3/api/tlm_api.rb	95.34% <100.00%> (+0.11%)	⬆️
...lib/openc3/microservices/interface_microservice.rb	84.27% <100.00%> (+0.30%)	⬆️
...smonitor/src/tools/LimitsMonitor/LimitsControl.vue	81.48% <0.00%> (-0.75%)	⬇️
...enc3-tool-calendar/src/tools/Calendar/Calendar.vue	71.03% <0.00%> (+5.51%)	⬆️
openc3/lib/openc3/operators/operator.rb	58.01% <0.00%> (+10.42%)	⬆️

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report at Codecov.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

[ryanmelt]

Maybe use Topics instead of CVT. But also it may be ok as is. Just think about it.

[ryanmelt]

Probably should pull from the last message in the Raw topic? That would be the most recent received_count. There will always be a race condition with this, but the CVT doesn't get updated until after decom, so for high rate packets this will probably be behind. (But then for high rate packets why are you using inject_tlm). Don't know.