Skip to content

False positive when adding optional property #490

Open

Description

@spg

When comparing these 2 schemas:

test/old.json

{
  "openapi": "3.0.0",
  "servers": [{ "url": "https://myserver.com" }],
  "info": { "title": "My API", "description": "Description", "version": "0.2.0" },
  "paths": {
    "/v1/entity/{id}": {
      "put": {
        "operationId": "myOperation",
        "description": "Some description",
        "requestBody": { "$ref": "#/components/requestBodies/updateBody" }
      }
    }
  },
  "components": {
    "schemas": {},
    "responses": {},
    "requestBodies": {
      "updateBody": {
        "description": "Update description",
        "content": {
          "application/json": {
            "schema": {
              "type": "object",
              "properties": {
                "url": { "type": "string", "description": "Some URL" }
              },
              "title": "updateBody",
              "additionalProperties": false
            }
          }
        }
      }
    },
    "parameters": {}
  }
}

test/new.json

{
  "openapi": "3.0.0",
  "servers": [{ "url": "https://myserver.com" }],
  "info": { "title": "My API", "description": "Description", "version": "0.2.0" },
  "paths": {
    "/v1/entity/{id}": {
      "put": {
        "operationId": "myOperation",
        "description": "Some description",
        "requestBody": { "$ref": "#/components/requestBodies/updateBody" }
      }
    }
  },
  "components": {
    "schemas": {},
    "responses": {},
    "requestBodies": {
      "updateBody": {
        "description": "Update description",
        "content": {
          "application/json": {
            "schema": {
              "type": "object",
              "properties": {
                "url": { "type": "string", "description": "Some URL" },
                "url2": { "type": "string", "description": "Some URL" }
              },
              "title": "updateBody",
              "additionalProperties": false
            }
          }
        }
      }
    },
    "parameters": {}
  }
}

I get a broken compatibility message:

docker run --rm -t -v $(pwd)/test/:/specs:ro openapitools/openapi-diff:latest --fail-on-incompatible  /specs/old.json /specs/new.json 
==========================================================================
==                            API CHANGE LOG                            ==
==========================================================================
                                  My API                                  
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
--                            What's Changed                            --
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
- PUT    /v1/entity/{id}
  Request:
        - Changed application/json
          Schema: Broken compatibility
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
--                                Result                                --
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 API changes broke backward compatibility                 
--------------------------------------------------------------------------

Note that the only change is the addition of the url2 optional property:

diff -u test/old.json test/new.json
--- test/old.json       2023-03-14 17:06:02
+++ test/new.json       2023-03-14 17:06:33
@@ -22,7 +22,8 @@
             "schema": {
               "type": "object",
               "properties": {
-                "url": { "type": "string", "description": "Some URL" }
+                "url": { "type": "string", "description": "Some URL" },
+                "url2": { "type": "string", "description": "Some URL" }
               },
               "title": "updateBody",
               "additionalProperties": false

Since the required field is absent, I would expect the addition of url2 to not create a broken compatibility error.

Activity

  1. joschi commented on Mar 14, 2023

    @joschi
    Contributor

    I think this was originally introduced in #136 / #137.

    Happy to discuss whether it still makes sense.

  2. mas-chen commented on Apr 4, 2023

    @mas-chen

    https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7231#section-4.3.4

    The RFC does say "SHOULD" and not "MUST" so I believe it would be good to make this strict check configurable

  3. mas-chen commented on Apr 4, 2023

    @mas-chen

    There's similar issues here: #251 and #264

  4. added and removed on Jan 30, 2025
  5. added this to the 2.2.0 milestone on Apr 24, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    Type

    Projects

    No projects

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions