surface rt 2 updates #2
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
DSI panel which is used in Microsoft Surface RT 2 Signed-off-by: Anton Bambura <jenneron@protonmail.com>
Enable Samsung 106HL02 DSI panel Signed-off-by: Anton Bambura <jenneron@protonmail.com>
Add DRM_PANEL_SAMSUNG_106HL02 Signed-off-by: Anton Bambura <jenneron@protonmail.com>
jonasschwoebel
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 21, 2022
btrfs_can_activate_zone() can be called with the device_list_mutex already
held, which will lead to a deadlock:
insert_dev_extents() // Takes device_list_mutex
`-> insert_dev_extent()
`-> btrfs_insert_empty_item()
`-> btrfs_insert_empty_items()
`-> btrfs_search_slot()
`-> btrfs_cow_block()
`-> __btrfs_cow_block()
`-> btrfs_alloc_tree_block()
`-> btrfs_reserve_extent()
`-> find_free_extent()
`-> find_free_extent_update_loop()
`-> can_allocate_chunk()
`-> btrfs_can_activate_zone() // Takes device_list_mutex again
As we're only traversing the list for reads we can switch from the
device_list_mutex to an RCU traversal of the list.
[15.166572] WARNING: possible recursive locking detected
[15.167117] 5.17.0-rc6-dennis grate-driver#79 Not tainted
[15.167487] --------------------------------------------
[15.167733] kworker/u8:3/146 is trying to acquire lock:
[15.167733] ffff888102962ee0 (&fs_devs->device_list_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: find_free_extent+0x15a/0x14f0 [btrfs]
[15.167733]
[15.167733] but task is already holding lock:
[15.167733] ffff888102962ee0 (&fs_devs->device_list_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_create_pending_block_groups+0x20a/0x560 [btrfs]
[15.167733]
[15.167733] other info that might help us debug this:
[15.167733] Possible unsafe locking scenario:
[15.167733]
[15.171834] CPU0
[15.171834] ----
[15.171834] lock(&fs_devs->device_list_mutex);
[15.171834] lock(&fs_devs->device_list_mutex);
[15.171834]
[15.171834] *** DEADLOCK ***
[15.171834]
[15.171834] May be due to missing lock nesting notation
[15.171834]
[15.171834] 5 locks held by kworker/u8:3/146:
[15.171834] #0: ffff888100050938 ((wq_completion)events_unbound){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x1c3/0x5a0
[15.171834] #1: ffffc9000067be80 ((work_completion)(&fs_info->async_data_reclaim_work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x1c3/0x5a0
[15.176244] #2: ffff88810521e620 (sb_internal){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: flush_space+0x335/0x600 [btrfs]
[15.176244] grate-driver#3: ffff888102962ee0 (&fs_devs->device_list_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_create_pending_block_groups+0x20a/0x560 [btrfs]
[15.176244] grate-driver#4: ffff8881152e4b78 (btrfs-dev-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_lock+0x27/0x130 [btrfs]
[15.179641]
[15.179641] stack backtrace:
[15.179641] CPU: 1 PID: 146 Comm: kworker/u8:3 Not tainted 5.17.0-rc6-dennis grate-driver#79
[15.179641] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.15.0-1.fc35 04/01/2014
[15.179641] Workqueue: events_unbound btrfs_async_reclaim_data_space [btrfs]
[15.179641] Call Trace:
[15.179641] <TASK>
[15.179641] dump_stack_lvl+0x45/0x59
[15.179641] __lock_acquire.cold+0x217/0x2b2
[15.179641] lock_acquire+0xbf/0x2b0
[15.183838] ? find_free_extent+0x15a/0x14f0 [btrfs]
[15.183838] __mutex_lock+0x8e/0x970
[15.183838] ? find_free_extent+0x15a/0x14f0 [btrfs]
[15.183838] ? find_free_extent+0x15a/0x14f0 [btrfs]
[15.183838] ? lock_is_held_type+0xd7/0x130
[15.183838] ? find_free_extent+0x15a/0x14f0 [btrfs]
[15.183838] find_free_extent+0x15a/0x14f0 [btrfs]
[15.183838] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x24/0x40
[15.183838] ? btrfs_get_alloc_profile+0x106/0x230 [btrfs]
[15.187601] btrfs_reserve_extent+0x131/0x260 [btrfs]
[15.187601] btrfs_alloc_tree_block+0xb5/0x3b0 [btrfs]
[15.187601] __btrfs_cow_block+0x138/0x600 [btrfs]
[15.187601] btrfs_cow_block+0x10f/0x230 [btrfs]
[15.187601] btrfs_search_slot+0x55f/0xbc0 [btrfs]
[15.187601] ? lock_is_held_type+0xd7/0x130
[15.187601] btrfs_insert_empty_items+0x2d/0x60 [btrfs]
[15.187601] btrfs_create_pending_block_groups+0x2b3/0x560 [btrfs]
[15.187601] __btrfs_end_transaction+0x36/0x2a0 [btrfs]
[15.192037] flush_space+0x374/0x600 [btrfs]
[15.192037] ? find_held_lock+0x2b/0x80
[15.192037] ? btrfs_async_reclaim_data_space+0x49/0x180 [btrfs]
[15.192037] ? lock_release+0x131/0x2b0
[15.192037] btrfs_async_reclaim_data_space+0x70/0x180 [btrfs]
[15.192037] process_one_work+0x24c/0x5a0
[15.192037] worker_thread+0x4a/0x3d0
Fixes: a85f05e ("btrfs: zoned: avoid chunk allocation if active block group has enough space")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.16+
Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
jonasschwoebel
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 21, 2022
Adjust helper function names and comments after mass rename of struct netfs_read_*request to struct netfs_io_*request. Changes ======= ver #2) - Make the changes in the docs also. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> cc: linux-cachefs@redhat.com Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/164622992433.3564931.6684311087845150271.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk/ # v1 Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/164678196111.1200972.5001114956865989528.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk/ # v2
jonasschwoebel
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 21, 2022
Pass start and len to the rreq allocator. This should ensure that the fields are set so that ->init_request() can use them. Also add a parameter to indicates the origin of the request. Ceph can use this to tell whether to get caps. Changes ======= ver grate-driver#3) - Change the author to me as Jeff feels that most of the patch is my changes now. ver #2) - Show the request origin in the netfs_rreq tracepoint. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Co-developed-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> cc: linux-cachefs@redhat.com Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/164622989020.3564931.17517006047854958747.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk/ # v1 Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/164678208569.1200972.12153682697842916557.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk/ # v2
jonasschwoebel
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 21, 2022
Add a netfs_i_context struct that should be included in the network
filesystem's own inode struct wrapper, directly after the VFS's inode
struct, e.g.:
struct my_inode {
struct {
struct inode vfs_inode;
struct netfs_i_context netfs_ctx;
};
};
The netfs_i_context struct so far contains a single field for the network
filesystem to use - the cache cookie:
struct netfs_i_context {
...
struct fscache_cookie *cache;
};
Three functions are provided to help with this:
(1) void netfs_i_context_init(struct inode *inode,
const struct netfs_request_ops *ops);
Initialise the netfs context and set the operations.
(2) struct netfs_i_context *netfs_i_context(struct inode *inode);
Find the netfs context from the VFS inode.
(3) struct inode *netfs_inode(struct netfs_i_context *ctx);
Find the VFS inode from the netfs context.
Changes
=======
ver grate-driver#3)
- Split out the bit to move ceph cap-getting on readahead into
ceph_init_request()[1].
ver #2)
- Adjust documentation to match.
- Use "#if IS_ENABLED()" in netfs_i_cookie(), not "#ifdef".
- Move the cap check from ceph_readahead() to ceph_init_request() to be
called from netfslib.
- Remove ceph_readahead() and use netfs_readahead() directly instead.
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
cc: linux-cachefs@redhat.com
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/8af0d47f17d89c06bbf602496dd845f2b0bf25b3.camel@kernel.org/ [1]
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/164622984545.3564931.15691742939278418580.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk/ # v1
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/164678213320.1200972.16807551936267647470.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk/ # v2
jonasschwoebel
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 21, 2022
Add a function to do the steps needed to begin a read request, allowing this code to be removed from several other functions and consolidated. Changes ======= ver #2) - Move before the unstaticking patch so that some functions can be left static. - Set uninitialised return code in netfs_begin_read()[1][2]. - Fixed a refleak caused by non-removal of a get from netfs_write_begin() when the request submission code got moved to netfs_begin_read(). Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> cc: linux-cachefs@redhat.com Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220303163826.1120936-1-nathan@kernel.org/ [1] Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220303235647.1297171-1-colin.i.king@gmail.com/ [2] Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/164623004355.3564931.7275693529042495641.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk/ # v1 Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/164678214287.1200972.16734134007649832160.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk/ # v2
jonasschwoebel
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 21, 2022
Rename netfs_rreq_unlock() to netfs_rreq_unlock_folios() to make it sound less like it's dropping a lock on an netfs_io_request struct. Remove the 'static' marker on netfs_rreq_unlock_folios() and declaring it in internal.h preparatory to splitting the file. Changes ======= ver #2) - Slide this patch to after the one adding netfs_begin_read(). - As a consequence, don't need to unstatic so many functions. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> cc: linux-cachefs@redhat.com Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/164623002861.3564931.17340149482236413375.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk/ # v1 Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/164678215208.1200972.9761906209395002182.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk/ # v2
jonasschwoebel
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 21, 2022
Rename the read_helper.c file to io.c before splitting out the buffered read functions and some other bits. Changes ======= ver #2) - Rename read_helper.c before splitting. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/164678216109.1200972.16567696909952495832.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk/ # v2
jonasschwoebel
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 21, 2022
Split fs/netfs/read_helper.c into two pieces, one to deal with buffered writes and one to deal with the I/O mechanism. Changes ======= ver #2) - Add kdoc reference to new file. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> cc: linux-cachefs@redhat.com Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/164623005586.3564931.6149556072728481767.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk/ # v1 Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/164678217075.1200972.5101072043126828757.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk/ # v2
jonasschwoebel
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 21, 2022
…k_under_node() Patch series "drivers/base/memory: determine and store zone for single-zone memory blocks", v2. I remember talking to Michal in the past about removing test_pages_in_a_zone(), which we use for: * verifying that a memory block we intend to offline is really only managed by a single zone. We don't support offlining of memory blocks that are managed by multiple zones (e.g., multiple nodes, DMA and DMA32) * exposing that zone to user space via /sys/devices/system/memory/memory*/valid_zones Now that I identified some more cases where test_pages_in_a_zone() might go wrong, and we received an UBSAN report (see patch grate-driver#3), let's get rid of this PFN walker. So instead of detecting the zone at runtime with test_pages_in_a_zone() by scanning the memmap, let's determine and remember for each memory block if it's managed by a single zone. The stored zone can then be used for the above two cases, avoiding a manual lookup using test_pages_in_a_zone(). This avoids eventually stumbling over uninitialized memmaps in corner cases, especially when ZONE_DEVICE ranges partly fall into memory block (that are responsible for managing System RAM). Handling memory onlining is easy, because we online to exactly one zone. Handling boot memory is more tricky, because we want to avoid scanning all zones of all nodes to detect possible zones that overlap with the physical memory region of interest. Fortunately, we already have code that determines the applicable nodes for a memory block, to create sysfs links -- we'll hook into that. Patch #1 is a simple cleanup I had laying around for a longer time. Patch #2 contains the main logic to remove test_pages_in_a_zone() and further details. [1] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220128144540.153902-1-david@redhat.com [2] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220203105212.30385-1-david@redhat.com This patch (of 2): Let's adjust the stale terminology, making it match unregister_memory_block_under_nodes() and do_register_memory_block_under_node(). We're dealing with memory block devices, which span 1..X memory sections. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220210184359.235565-1-david@redhat.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220210184359.235565-2-david@redhat.com Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Acked-by: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org> Cc: Rafael Parra <rparrazo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
However i added the panel to defconfig as built-in, it sometimes doesn't work, consider using it as a module once you have modules in userspace