docs: normalize legacy plan names to current tiers#36
Conversation
Replace legacy tier names (Exploration / Production Boost / Reservoir Mastery) in customer-facing docs and the QA issue-generator script with the current billing tiers: Developer ($19/10K), Starter ($49/50K, webhooks), Professional ($99/100K, webhooks + WebSocket streaming), Scale ($299/1M). Docs/comments only; no functional code changed. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
Warning Review limit reached
More reviews will be available in 15 minutes and 36 seconds. Learn how PR review limits work. Your organization has used up its prepaid credits, and credit purchases are no longer available. Enable the review add-on in the billing tab to keep reviews running — you're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file). ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based credits. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan refill rate. For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, the refill rate gradually slows as usage increases. The highest same-day bursts are limited more strictly. Please see our Fair Usage Limits Policy for further information. ℹ️ Review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: defaults Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (4)
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
Replace "Reservoir Mastery" in the README streaming section and the reject_subscription ConnectionError message with current billing language: "Professional plan ($99/mo) or higher" (streaming gates at Professional+). The error string keeps the "Subscription rejected" prefix so the existing streaming unit test still matches. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
* docs: normalize legacy plan names to current tiers Replace legacy tier names (Exploration / Production Boost / Reservoir Mastery) in customer-facing docs and the QA issue-generator script with the current billing tiers: Developer ($19/10K), Starter ($49/50K, webhooks), Professional ($99/100K, webhooks + WebSocket streaming), Scale ($299/1M). Docs/comments only; no functional code changed. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs: normalize remaining streaming plan-name references Replace "Reservoir Mastery" in the README streaming section and the reject_subscription ConnectionError message with current billing language: "Professional plan ($99/mo) or higher" (streaming gates at Professional+). The error string keeps the "Subscription rejected" prefix so the existing streaming unit test still matches. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
1 participant
Replaces legacy plan/tier names in customer-facing SDK docs and the QA issue-generator script with the current billing tiers (from
GET /billing/plans).Changes
docs/index.md— Paid Plans section: replaced legacyExploration $15 / Production Boost $45 / Reservoir Mastery $129with current tiers:CREATE_QA_GITHUB_ISSUES.sh— QA blocker note: "Production Boost access" → "Professional plan ($99/mo) access".Docs/strings only. No functional code, paths, or Python source changed. No version bump.
🤖 Generated with Claude Code