Skip to content

add timeboost for orbit considerations and deployment instructions #2260

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 31 commits into from
Jul 1, 2025

Conversation

leeederek
Copy link
Member

@leeederek leeederek commented Apr 24, 2025

this pull requests adds:

  • a new page for Timeboost considerations
  • a new blank page for timeboost deployment instructions - make sure we include the auction contract deployment instructions feat: DeployExpressLaneAuctionScript orbit-actions#31
  • a link to the research paper that compares timeboost to PGA for time-advantaged arbitraguers

Copy link

vercel bot commented Apr 24, 2025

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Updated (UTC)
arbitrum-docs ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview Jul 1, 2025 9:56pm

Copy link
Contributor

@anegg0 anegg0 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I added editorial suggestions. There seems to be a problem with deploy-timeboost.mdx, though. Let me know how I can help, @leeederek

leeederek and others added 2 commits May 6, 2025 15:44
Thanks Gael!

Co-authored-by: Gaël Blanchemain <anegg0@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Tristan-Wilson <87238672+Tristan-Wilson@users.noreply.github.com>
Copy link
Contributor

@anegg0 anegg0 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@anegg0 anegg0 merged commit af3bd85 into master Jul 1, 2025
5 checks passed
@anegg0 anegg0 deleted the timeboost-for-orbit branch July 1, 2025 21:56
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants