🗺 Create a set of architecural landscape illustrations

[janhalen]

Illustrations

Here collaboration can take place on discussing potential solutions architectures and illustrating what components the business needs in some more high level solution landscape illustrations

• Create a very high level, business targeted solution landscape, illustrating a simplified dataflow
• 🎩 Review, discuss and illustrate the potential value of the Dapr framework as a framework. #13

[janhalen]

@TroelsRanum: After our meeting today my takeaway was that a more conceptual illustration is needed, that filters some of the technical realities and only shows a simplified version of potential dataflows in the solution.

I'll get started as soon as i can!

[TroelsRanum]

That would be very helpful when we are about to try and convince the right people to convince other people to board this ship. Thank you.

[janhalen]

Ok.. @TroelsRanum & @HenrikEmilArensEAatAarhus

I have a suggestion.. somwhat along these lines... but i might need some feedback on the naming of the elements, to make it easier to understand what is what 😄

flowchart LR
    a(("🏢 OS² Fagsystem")) --> l["🔄 data-workflow-engine"]
    b(("🏭 OS² Fagsystem")) --> l
    c(("🏗️ OS² Fagsystem")) --> l
    e(("🏛️ OS² Fagsystem")) --> l
    f(("🏠 Fagsystem")) --> l --> a
    l ---> g["📊 Target 1"] & h["📈 Target 2"]
    l --> j["🔀 KOMBIT<br> Distributor component"]
    j --> m(("💻 Fagsystem")) & n(("🖥️ Fagsystem")) & o(("📟 Fagsystem")) & p(("🖨️ Fagsystem"))

    style a fill:#F0E6E6,stroke:#D4BFBF,stroke-width:2px,color:#333333
    style l fill:#F0F0F0,stroke:#D4D4D4,stroke-width:2px,color:#333333
    style b fill:#E6F0E6,stroke:#BFD4BF,stroke-width:2px,color:#333333
    style c fill:#E6E6F0,stroke:#BFBFD4,stroke-width:2px,color:#333333
    style e fill:#F0E6F0,stroke:#D4BFD4,stroke-width:2px,color:#333333
    style f fill:#E6F0F0,stroke:#BFD4D4,stroke-width:2px,color:#333333
    style g fill:#F0E6EC,stroke:#D4BFC7,stroke-width:2px,rx:10,ry:10,color:#333333
    style h fill:#E6ECF0,stroke:#BFC7D4,stroke-width:2px,rx:10,ry:10,color:#333333
    style j fill:#E6F0EC,stroke:#BFD4C7,stroke-width:2px,rx:10,ry:10,color:#333333
    style m fill:#ECE6F0,stroke:#C7BFD4,stroke-width:2px,color:#333333
    style n fill:#E6F0F0,stroke:#BFD4D4,stroke-width:2px,color:#333333
    style o fill:#F0F0E6,stroke:#D4D4BF,stroke-width:2px,color:#333333
    style p fill:#F0E6F0,stroke:#D4BFD4,stroke-width:2px,color:#333333

    linkStyle 0 stroke:#E6B3B3,fill:none
    linkStyle 1 stroke:#B3E6CC,fill:none
    linkStyle 2 stroke:#B3CCE6,fill:none
    linkStyle 3 stroke:#CCB3E6,fill:none
    linkStyle 4 stroke:#E6CCB3,fill:none
    linkStyle 5 stroke:#B3E6E6,fill:none
    linkStyle 6 stroke:#E6B3CC,fill:none
    linkStyle 7 stroke:#B3CCE6,fill:none
    linkStyle 8 stroke:#CCE6B3,fill:none
    linkStyle 9 stroke:#E6B3CC,fill:none
    linkStyle 10 stroke:#B3E6E6,fill:none
    linkStyle 11 stroke:#E6E6B3,fill:none

Loading

[TroelsRanum]

This looks like something that would make sense to most people. Good job!
I could rename some of them, but we might just do that when we know who we are going to show it. Then use the systems that they are familiar with?

[janhalen]

Moving along, some more technical aspects of the architecture is being discussed (and even illustrated) here:

#13