Xlmodel 202510

[xzt777]

将 Nuclei Studio xlmodel 相关的 doc 更新适配到 202510

---

Important

Update documentation to align with Nuclei Studio version 2025.10, including configuration and profiling instructions.

• Documentation Updates:
  • Update 18-demonstrate_NICE_VNICE_acceleration_of_the_Nuclei_Model_through_profiling.md to reflect Nuclei Studio version 2025.10, including changes in configuration steps and profiling results.
  • Update 19-rapid_verification_of_NICE_VNICE_acceleration_with_Nuclei_Model_and_NICE_Wizard.md to reflect Nuclei Studio version 2025.10, including changes in configuration steps and profiling results.
• Misc:
  • Update generation date in README.md to 2025-12-05.

^{This description was created by for db3f8e0. You can customize this summary. It will automatically update as commits are pushed.}

[ellipsis-dev]

Important

Looks good to me! 👍

Reviewed everything up to db3f8e0 in 2 minutes and 16 seconds. Click for details.

• Reviewed 213 lines of code in 3 files
• Skipped 17 files when reviewing.
• Skipped posting 19 draft comments. View those below.
• Modify your settings and rules to customize what types of comments Ellipsis leaves. And don't forget to react with 👍 or 👎 to teach Ellipsis.

1. 18-demonstrate_NICE_VNICE_acceleration_of_the_Nuclei_Model_through_profiling.md:3

• Draft comment:
  Updated testing note now indicates Windows version (>=2025.10) instead of Linux-only. Please verify this change aligns with the current platform support.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Confidence changes required: 0% <= threshold 50% None

2. 18-demonstrate_NICE_VNICE_acceleration_of_the_Nuclei_Model_through_profiling.md:15

• Draft comment:
  The link to 'NucleiStudio_User_Guide.pdf' has been updated to the 202510 version. Confirm that the updated document URL is correct.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Confidence changes required: 0% <= threshold 50% None

3. 18-demonstrate_NICE_VNICE_acceleration_of_the_Nuclei_Model_through_profiling.md:28

• Draft comment:
  Environment setup updated to reference 'NucleiStudio 2025.10 Windows' instead of the older Linux version. Ensure this reflects the intended primary platform.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Confidence changes required: 0% <= threshold 50% None

4. 18-demonstrate_NICE_VNICE_acceleration_of_the_Nuclei_Model_through_profiling.md:67

• Draft comment:
  The profiling configuration instructions have been revised to use 'GDB Nuclei Model riscv Debugging' instead of the older 'RVProf' approach. Confirm that these revised steps match the current IDE interface.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Confidence changes required: 0% <= threshold 50% None

5. 18-demonstrate_NICE_VNICE_acceleration_of_the_Nuclei_Model_through_profiling.md:352

• Draft comment:
  Cycle count values in the performance table have been updated (from 154,988/35,619 to 161,108/42,066). Please verify that these new figures accurately reflect performance measurements with the updated model.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Confidence changes required: 0% <= threshold 50% None

6. 18-demonstrate_NICE_VNICE_acceleration_of_the_Nuclei_Model_through_profiling.md:279

• Draft comment:
  The original Nuclei Model package download link has been updated. Please confirm that the new link is correct and accessible.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Confidence changes required: 0% <= threshold 50% None

7. 18-demonstrate_NICE_VNICE_acceleration_of_the_Nuclei_Model_through_profiling.md:307

• Draft comment:
  In the section describing how to retrieve the compiled model executable, the download links and instructions have been updated. Verify that both provided options are valid and clear.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Confidence changes required: 0% <= threshold 50% None

8. 19-rapid_verification_of_NICE_VNICE_acceleration_with_Nuclei_Model_and_NICE_Wizard.md:3

• Draft comment:
  Updated the testing environment note to reflect usage on Windows (>=2025.10) instead of the previous version. Confirm consistency with other documentation.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Confidence changes required: 0% <= threshold 50% None

9. 19-rapid_verification_of_NICE_VNICE_acceleration_with_Nuclei_Model_and_NICE_Wizard.md:30

• Draft comment:
  The download links for NucleiStudio have been updated to the 202510 versions for both Windows and Linux. Please ensure these URLs are correct.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Confidence changes required: 0% <= threshold 50% None

10. 19-rapid_verification_of_NICE_VNICE_acceleration_with_Nuclei_Model_and_NICE_Wizard.md:36

• Draft comment:
  The xlmodel_nice package download links have been updated to new URLs. Verify that the new links (for both Windows and Linux) are accessible.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Confidence changes required: 0% <= threshold 50% None

11. 19-rapid_verification_of_NICE_VNICE_acceleration_with_Nuclei_Model_and_NICE_Wizard.md:58

• Draft comment:
  The profiling configuration instructions have been revised to use 'GDB Nuclei Model riscv Debugging'. Confirm that the new instructions are accurate and user-friendly.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Confidence changes required: 0% <= threshold 50% None

12. 19-rapid_verification_of_NICE_VNICE_acceleration_with_Nuclei_Model_and_NICE_Wizard.md:72

• Draft comment:
  A note has been added specifying that for Nuclei Studio (<2025.10) the ELF file is located at 'build/default/xl_cpumodel'. Please verify that this information is correct.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Confidence changes required: 0% <= threshold 50% None

13. 19-rapid_verification_of_NICE_VNICE_acceleration_with_Nuclei_Model_and_NICE_Wizard.md:196

• Draft comment:
  Cycle statistics in the comparison table have been updated with slight numerical adjustments. Please ensure that these new measurements (e.g., 3844 cycles, 122 cycles) are correctly calculated.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Confidence changes required: 0% <= threshold 50% None

14. 19-rapid_verification_of_NICE_VNICE_acceleration_with_Nuclei_Model_and_NICE_Wizard.md:200

• Draft comment:
  The URL for the optimized xlmodel_nice package has been updated. Confirm that the new link is valid and the package is available.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Confidence changes required: 0% <= threshold 50% None

15. README.md:33

• Draft comment:
  The generated timestamp has been updated to '2025-12-05 16:17:56'. This update appears correct.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Confidence changes required: 0% <= threshold 50% None

16. 18-demonstrate_NICE_VNICE_acceleration_of_the_Nuclei_Model_through_profiling.md:22

• Draft comment:
  Typo notice: In the sentence starting with 'NICE/VNICE使得用户可以结合自己的应用扩展自定义指令，将芯来的标准处理器核扩展成为面向领域专用的处理器...'. The term '芯来的' appears unusual—please verify if it should be '芯片的' or another intended term.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.

17. 18-demonstrate_NICE_VNICE_acceleration_of_the_Nuclei_Model_through_profiling.md:84

• Draft comment:
  Typographical note: The image alt text is 'image-ase_demo_cycle' while the referenced file is 'aes_demo_cycle.png'. Consider correcting 'ase' to 'aes' to maintain consistency.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Comment was on unchanged code.

18. 19-rapid_verification_of_NICE_VNICE_acceleration_with_Nuclei_Model_and_NICE_Wizard.md:56

• Draft comment:
  There appears to be a typographical error in the image file name on this line. "Nuclei_Settting" may be intended to be "Nuclei_Setting". Please verify and update if necessary.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Comment was on unchanged code.

19. README.md:37

• Draft comment:
  Typo: The file name '3-print_memor_usage_in_ide.md' appears to have a misspelling ('memor' should likely be 'memory'). Please correct it.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.

Workflow ID: wflow_ufgetYNLwDxpZtGO

^{You can customize by changing your verbosity settings, reacting with 👍 or 👎, replying to comments, or adding code review rules.}