[Evals] Add support for OMNI Math #97
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Signed-off-by: SumanthRH <sumanthrh@anyscale.com>
Signed-off-by: SumanthRH <sumanthrh@anyscale.com>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What does this PR do?
Adds OMNI-Math. Part 1 of resolving #51 .
FOr OMNI-Math, the authors did LLM as a Judge evaluation with GPT-4o, but also provided a benchmark subset for rule-based evlauation. We do not support LLM as a Judge yet, so this PR only adds support for rule-based evaluation.
The dataset for rule-based evaluation is provided in this repo: https://github.com/KbsdJames/omni-math-rule
I have uploaded the same as an alternate split in the official HF dataset: https://huggingface.co/datasets/KbsdJames/Omni-MATH/discussions/2