Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Sep 3, 2025. It is now read-only.

Conversation

@kevgliss
Copy link
Contributor

@kevgliss kevgliss commented Aug 7, 2023

No description provided.

@kevgliss kevgliss added the bug Something isn't working label Aug 7, 2023
Copy link
Contributor

@forestmonster forestmonster left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm curious about concurrent.futures.ThreadPoolExecutor, and if num_workers=100 has the potential to create a new bottleneck?

@Netflix Netflix deleted a comment from forestmonster Aug 8, 2023
@kevgliss kevgliss merged commit 28322d8 into master Aug 8, 2023
@kevgliss kevgliss deleted the bugfix/scheduler-processes branch August 8, 2023 20:30
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

bug Something isn't working

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants