-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 176
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add support for forecast-only low resolution #1648
Add support for forecast-only low resolution #1648
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good so far.
--- fix from Jiande Wang
There's been an update removing a "to do" item in this PR from @jiandewang who removed the 025 resolution dependency in the ocean post. The only thing that changes is meta-data. The three tests with this new output can be found here: |
New cpl fix version 20230526 created for this update. Orog fix changes was just additions, so existing version (20220805) is still used. |
I have updated the version for cpl and am currently working to test a fresh clone for out of the box runs on hera. Note the ICs are currently only staged on hera, so if these tests are desired for other machines we need to have @jiandewang move them to WCOSS2 and others to move to orion into the IC staged area. Please let me know what else I can do for this PR. Note, I also just finished adding a low res wave capability to this, which should get a new PR for that soon as well. |
Latest test will be here: /scratch1/NCEPDEV/climate/Jessica.Meixner/lowresgw/usefixfromofficial/c48o500 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Approved pending CI testing
Automated global-workflow Testing Results:
|
Automated global-workflow Testing Results:
|
The error is:
However I'm not sure how any of the changes I made changed something here? I'll sync in the develop to this branch in case that's the issue? |
@EdwardSafford-NOAA would you please take a look at this failure? It seems unrelated to @JessicaMeixner-NOAA's PR, but CI tests passed before this. Might just be a fluke this PR hit it, but it needs to be fixed. |
Oops, hit the wrong button. @EdwardSafford-NOAA @JessicaMeixner-NOAA I'm going to rerun the CI test, so I copied the rotdir and radmon directories to |
@WalterKolczynski-NOAA I agree this error is likely unrelated to changes in this PR. |
Automated global-workflow Testing Results:
|
Automated global-workflow Testing Results:
|
Automated global-workflow Testing Results:
|
@WalterKolczynski-NOAA @EdwardSafford-NOAA the CI seems to be working, but I'm not sure what changed other than merging in the develop, was that the issue? |
Maybe, which is kinda why I reran it. Though I don't know why that should've mattered and it still seems like a bug, even if it went away here. |
@WalterKolczynski-NOAA anything I need to do on my end? |
@JessicaMeixner-NOAA Not now, just waiting for the CI test to complete and go green. Edit: Oh wait, it did. Shellcheck complaints are trivial and in-line with the surrounding code. Merging. |
This adds an option for 2 or 5 deg global wave models, which will provide a light weight version to assist in engineering development. -- This PR requires PR #1648 to be merged as this builds on it as well as issue #1652 which adds the fix files needed for this PR to be addressed first. The resources were chosen to stay under 1 or 2 node and be faster than the atm component. - Fixes #1333
Description
This PR ensures that we can run C96 5deg and C48 5 deg for 2021032312.
ICs were staged on hera from @sanatcumar and @guillaumevernieres so that this can be run "out of the box", but will have to be transferred to other machines if desired.
This PR requires two fix file updates:
#1647
#1645
that must be completed before this is merged.
Thank you to: @sanatcumar @barlage @HelinWei-NOAA Bing Fu @jiandewang @guillaumevernieres @aerorahul @NeilBarton-NOAA and others who helped provide input, fix files, directions, and other help!
Type of change
Please delete options that are not relevant.
How Has This Been Tested?
NOTE The default for C96 is 1 deg therefore you must change your config.base to have the correct ocean resolution
Checklist