Skip to content

Conversation

@selina-dxw
Copy link
Collaborator

@selina-dxw selina-dxw commented Feb 3, 2026

Iterating smoking questions

@edwardhorsford edwardhorsford temporarily deployed to dsps-design-selina-dxw--bbjpsf February 3, 2026 16:24 Inactive
@edwardhorsford edwardhorsford temporarily deployed to dsps-design-selina-dxw--bbjpsf February 4, 2026 11:32 Inactive
@edwardhorsford edwardhorsford temporarily deployed to dsps-design-selina-dxw--bbjpsf February 4, 2026 11:36 Inactive
@edwardhorsford edwardhorsford temporarily deployed to dsps-design-selina-dxw--bbjpsf February 4, 2026 11:37 Inactive
@edwardhorsford edwardhorsford temporarily deployed to dsps-design-selina-dxw--bbjpsf February 4, 2026 12:01 Inactive
@edwardhorsford edwardhorsford temporarily deployed to dsps-design-selina-dxw--bbjpsf February 4, 2026 12:46 Inactive
@ralph-hawkins
Copy link
Collaborator

This is really, really great. I think it should be 2 or 3 posts though? There's so much good stuff, and I think people would be more able to get what they're looking for, if it was split with one main insight/action per post.

You could break this into something like:

  • what we learned about how people recall their smoking history (research findings + the mindset segmentations)
  • the challenge of balancing clinical accuracy with user engagement (the impact mapping, over/under-screening)
  • what we designed and why (the actual iterations and current approach)

The imperfect science of calculating risk section is really great. It frames the whole thing, could that be put earlier?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants