Skip to content

Skip tests if ceda-jasmin s3 storage is offline#187

Merged
valeriupredoi merged 3 commits intomainfrom
skip_tests_if_s3_offline
Jan 28, 2026
Merged

Skip tests if ceda-jasmin s3 storage is offline#187
valeriupredoi merged 3 commits intomainfrom
skip_tests_if_s3_offline

Conversation

@valeriupredoi
Copy link
Collaborator

@valeriupredoi valeriupredoi commented Jan 28, 2026

Description

We should skip those tests, otherwise requests goes into a long loop that will eventually fail, note that I've not used a pytest fixture for it so we can simply pop boolean variables in pytest markers.

Before you get started

Checklist

  • This pull request has a descriptive title and labels
  • This pull request has a minimal description (most was discussed in the issue, but a two-liner description is still desirable)
  • Unit tests have been added (if codecov test fails)
  • Any changed dependencies have been added or removed correctly (if need be)
  • If you are working on the documentation, please ensure the current build passes
  • All tests pass

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 28, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 77.33%. Comparing base (1b1e862) to head (8d76284).
⚠️ Report is 5 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #187   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   77.33%   77.33%           
=======================================
  Files          15       15           
  Lines        2974     2974           
  Branches      477      477           
=======================================
  Hits         2300     2300           
  Misses        555      555           
  Partials      119      119           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@valeriupredoi valeriupredoi merged commit 259b090 into main Jan 28, 2026
8 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant