-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 11.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Create storage-fund.md #2144
Create storage-fund.md #2144
Conversation
Move deletion option footnote from overview, mark Important
More specifically, the storage fund has three key features: | ||
|
||
- It is funded by past transactions and functions as a tool for shifting gas fees across different epochs. This ensures that future validators are compensated for their storage costs by the past users who created those storage requirements in the first place. | ||
- It pays out only the returns on its capital and does not distribute its principal. That is, in practice, it is as if validators were able to borrow the storage fund’s SUI as additional stake and keep the majority of stake rewards (a $\gamma$). But note that validators do not receive funds directly from the storage fund. This guarantees the fund never loses its capitalization and can survive indefinitely. This feature is further buttressed by the $(1-\gamma)$ of stake rewards reinvested in the fund. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Weirdly enough, I don't get the greeks formatted correctly here.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Weirdly enough, I don't get the greeks formatted correctly here.
@econmysten can you take a look? Thanks!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
this seems to be a github problem. the math typsetting does not appear to work in bulleted lists?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
this seems to be a github problem. the math typsetting does not appear to work in bulleted lists?
I confirmed this is true by moving the lines out of the list. I tried some hacks (escaping) from this page first to no avail:
https://docs.github.com/en/get-started/writing-on-github/working-with-advanced-formatting/writing-mathematical-expressions
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
figured out a fix, leaving an empty line between the bullet points
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
figured out a fix, leaving an empty line between the bullet points
Nice. LGTM.
Iterate on bulleted list
Move bulleted list out to display math
fixed the typesetting issue. weird, but if you leave an empty line between the bullet points it works.
No description provided.