Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Create storage-fund.md #2144

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
May 23, 2022
Merged

Create storage-fund.md #2144

merged 6 commits into from
May 23, 2022

Conversation

Clay-Mysten
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the Type: Documentation Improvements or additions to documentation label May 23, 2022
Move deletion option footnote from overview, mark Important
More specifically, the storage fund has three key features:

- It is funded by past transactions and functions as a tool for shifting gas fees across different epochs. This ensures that future validators are compensated for their storage costs by the past users who created those storage requirements in the first place.
- It pays out only the returns on its capital and does not distribute its principal. That is, in practice, it is as if validators were able to borrow the storage fund’s SUI as additional stake and keep the majority of stake rewards (a $\gamma$). But note that validators do not receive funds directly from the storage fund. This guarantees the fund never loses its capitalization and can survive indefinitely. This feature is further buttressed by the $(1-\gamma)$ of stake rewards reinvested in the fund.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Weirdly enough, I don't get the greeks formatted correctly here.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Weirdly enough, I don't get the greeks formatted correctly here.

@econmysten can you take a look? Thanks!

Copy link
Contributor

@econmysten econmysten May 23, 2022

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this seems to be a github problem. the math typsetting does not appear to work in bulleted lists?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this seems to be a github problem. the math typsetting does not appear to work in bulleted lists?

I confirmed this is true by moving the lines out of the list. I tried some hacks (escaping) from this page first to no avail:
https://docs.github.com/en/get-started/writing-on-github/working-with-advanced-formatting/writing-mathematical-expressions

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

figured out a fix, leaving an empty line between the bullet points

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

figured out a fix, leaving an empty line between the bullet points

Nice. LGTM.

Iterate on bulleted list
Move bulleted list out to display math
fixed the typesetting issue. weird, but if you leave an empty line between the bullet points it works.
@econmysten econmysten merged commit 110ab34 into main May 23, 2022
@econmysten econmysten deleted the Clay-Mysten-patch-10 branch May 23, 2022 21:02
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Type: Documentation Improvements or additions to documentation
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants