Skip to content

[TASK] Be less strict about the @covers annotation #686

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 28, 2024

Conversation

oliverklee
Copy link
Collaborator

We still want to require the @covers annotation to be used for testcase (forceCoversAnnotation="true"), but we also want to be able to indirectly execute code that is not referenced via an @covers annotation.

We still want to require the `@covers` annotation to be used for
testcase (`forceCoversAnnotation="true"`), but we also want to be
able to indirectly execute code that is not referenced via an
`@covers` annotation.
Copy link
Collaborator

@JakeQZ JakeQZ left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@JakeQZ JakeQZ merged commit 0792d33 into main Aug 28, 2024
20 checks passed
@JakeQZ JakeQZ deleted the task/less-strict-coverage branch August 28, 2024 00:34
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants