Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Gather existing research for Network web presence #840

Open
xmatthewx opened this issue Nov 11, 2016 · 9 comments
Open

Gather existing research for Network web presence #840

xmatthewx opened this issue Nov 11, 2016 · 9 comments

Comments

@xmatthewx
Copy link
Collaborator

xmatthewx commented Nov 11, 2016

@samanthaburton @HPaulJohnson @LauraReynal – Between now and Hawaii, the design team will examine the Mozilla Network, to prepare us to build a web presence for it (site, comms, social strategy).

Their first two tasks are to develop a deep understanding of our audience, so we can then distill and frame the primary things we offer to this audience.

We need your help to gather existing MoFo research and identify the salient discoveries that should guide our work. Surveys, market research, field studies ... particularly things on the level of fellows and grant partners (as opposed to club participants). I will reach out to Mary Ellen and Tim as well, but feel free to include MoCo things that have been most useful to you.

Make sense? Need any other info? A meeting?

It would also be useful to have access to profiles from the recognition program, exemplars of our audience.

Let's gather and discuss here, and then maybe post to a wiki page on https://github.com/MozillaFoundation/research/

@samanthaburton
Copy link

samanthaburton commented Nov 11, 2016

@xmatthewx This is clear and I'm happy to help - and also keen to get my hands on those research pieces! I'll have an initial dig around how.

However, I have a hunch that a lot of what you're looking for lives within different parts of MLN - is there someone else we could add to the "R" in the DARCI who would know where to find/who to ask about those pieces? Personally, I don't know what I don't know - so I'll be swinging in the dark a bit.

re: grant partners, perhaps An-Me be the best person to loop in on that side?

Also, if it turns out that you don't have all the audience info you need, would you gather more data? Or just build a beta site based on what you have, and gather more data in testing? Or something else?

@xmatthewx
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Great questions @samanthaburton. I think the answers are TBD by us over the next few weeks and in Hawaii. Let's find out what we do know, identify gaps in our knowledge, and then make a plan to research and to march forward with lean and agile discovery.

@xmatthewx
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Adding @arlissc.

@samanthaburton
Copy link

Ok, here's a quick list of related projects I'm aware of (if folks flag those that sound useful, I can dig deeper) -

  • Mozilla Target Audience study (exploring the concious chooser) - Tim/MEM
  • Understanding open source tech contributors - George
  • Web literacy focus groups w/partners - An-Me
  • Network Mapping & Network Strength - Arliss/Sam
  • Webmaker research - Laura/Bob
  • Fellowship entry/exit surveys - fellowship leads? (I'm not 100% sure if this is a coordinated effort... just remember hearing about it!)

@xmatthewx
Copy link
Collaborator Author

xmatthewx commented Nov 15, 2016

Thanks @samanthaburton. After we gather things, let's file public stuff in Pulse to simplify this quest in the future. 😺

These seem particularly useful:

@lauradereynal
Copy link

@xmatthewx the work we did for the Teach.Mozilla.org website might also be useful: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1GJt1NqbBBvZGqPWIj8YUT-qXjCPfC30tfYEVfvqFwqs/edit

Other than that, all the report we published in 2015 are here: mzl.la/globalweb
When we publish them into Pulse or elsewhere, we should call it the Global Web Research. We removed the Webmaker language from these reports, since they cover more topics and are more focused on web literacy and the different web usages around the world, rather than Webmaker specifically.

Let me know if I can help more 😄

@kaythaney
Copy link

@auremoser would be your go to re: fellowship surveys (if there are any)
...

On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 2:51 PM, Laura de Reynal notifications@github.com
wrote:

@xmatthewx https://github.com/xmatthewx the work we did for the
Teach.Mozilla.org website might also be useful: https://docs.google.com/
document/d/1GJt1NqbBBvZGqPWIj8YUT-qXjCPfC30tfYEVfvqFwqs/edit

Other than that, all the report we published in 2015 are here:
mzl.la/globalweb
When we publish them into Pulse or elsewhere, we should call it the Global
Web Research. We removed the Webmaker language from these reports,
since they cover more topics and are more focused on web literacy and the
different web usages around the world, rather than Webmaker specifically.

Let me know if I can help more 😄


You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
#840 (comment),
or mute the thread
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAh174WGMXVJYOrE4h1cLmXOUuO8ewZ0ks5q-g1RgaJpZM4Kv333
.

@kaythaney http://twitter.com/kaythaney/

@auremoser
Copy link
Collaborator

Totes, there are many, I can give whoever needs access to the results, most of them are here, mostly associated with events:

@xmatthewx
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Thanks @auremoser @LauraReynal @samanthaburton for all the useful info and links. I updated list above. Just a few more things to gather.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants