fix(docs): correct typos and improve consistency across articles

[QuestSWE]

This pull request fixes multiple typographical, grammatical, and minor wording issues across various documentation files.

• Corrects typos and missing words or duplicates
• Improves clarity and consistency in phrasing
• No changes were made to technical content or formatting logic

Additionally:

• Removed one <param> XML comment that referred to a non-existent parameter
• Removed one line of unreachable code that had been left behind after a previous refactor (X = Y; immediately overridden on the next line)

These were small, safe cleanups to prevent confusion or dead code.

These edits follow the style and tone already established in the project.

Let me know if you’d like anything adjusted.

[AristurtleDev]

Overall good work @QuestSWE and thanks for the fixes.

There are some minor changes requested

1. Avoid using contractions (such as "we're", use "we are" instead).
2. One section and ordered list was changed to an unordered list. It should be ordered since the statements presented are done so in order of execution.
3. A few places where < > got added around the xref links when it's not needed.

[QuestSWE]

All the changes above have been resolved.

[AristurtleDev]

@SimonDarksideJ Should be good on this one