Conversation
cka-y
added
the
do not merge
Contributor
Author
|
This PR needs documentation change on gtfs.org to be fully tested. |
cka-y
marked this pull request as ready for review
February 23, 2026 14:20
cka-y
removed
the
do not merge
jcpitre
reviewed
Feb 23, 2026
Contributor
📝 Acceptance Test Report📋 Summary✅ The rule acceptance has passed for commit 99ad0f5 📊 Notices ComparisonNew Errors (0 out of 987 datasets, ~0%) ✅No changes were detected due to the code change. Dropped Errors (1 out of 987 datasets, ~0%) ✅Details of new errors due to code change, which is less than the provided threshold of 1%.
New Warnings (0 out of 987 datasets, ~0%) ✅No changes were detected due to the code change. Dropped Warnings (0 out of 987 datasets, ~0%) ✅No changes were detected due to the code change. 🛡️ Corruption Check16 out of 1003 sources (~2 %) are corrupted.
⏱️ Performance Assessment📈 Validation TimeAssess the performance in terms of seconds taken for the validation process.
📜 Memory Consumption
|
Co-authored-by: jcpitre <106176106+jcpitre@users.noreply.github.com>
This comment was marked as duplicate.
This comment was marked as duplicate.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
Contributor
📝 Acceptance Test Report📋 Summary✅ The rule acceptance has passed for commit 3e26a2a 📊 Notices ComparisonNew Errors (0 out of 987 datasets, ~0%) ✅No changes were detected due to the code change. Dropped Errors (0 out of 987 datasets, ~0%) ✅No changes were detected due to the code change. New Warnings (0 out of 987 datasets, ~0%) ✅No changes were detected due to the code change. Dropped Warnings (0 out of 987 datasets, ~0%) ✅No changes were detected due to the code change. 🛡️ Corruption Check16 out of 1003 sources (~2 %) are corrupted.
⏱️ Performance Assessment📈 Validation TimeAssess the performance in terms of seconds taken for the validation process.
📜 Memory Consumption
|
jcpitre
approved these changes
Feb 23, 2026
Contributor
📝 Acceptance Test Report📋 Summary✅ The rule acceptance has passed for commit 3dd7cd3 📊 Notices ComparisonNew Errors (1 out of 987 datasets, ~0%) ✅Details of new errors due to code change, which is less than the provided threshold of 1%.
Dropped Errors (0 out of 987 datasets, ~0%) ✅No changes were detected due to the code change. New Warnings (0 out of 987 datasets, ~0%) ✅No changes were detected due to the code change. Dropped Warnings (0 out of 987 datasets, ~0%) ✅No changes were detected due to the code change. 🛡️ Corruption Check16 out of 1003 sources (~2 %) are corrupted.
⏱️ Performance Assessment📈 Validation TimeAssess the performance in terms of seconds taken for the validation process.
📜 Memory Consumption
|
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary:
This pull request adds support for detecting the presence of the "Cars Allowed" feature in GTFS feeds by checking for the
cars_allowedfield in trip records. The change ensures that the feature is included in the feed's metadata summary if at least one record contains this field.Please make sure these boxes are checked before submitting your pull request - thanks!
gradle testto make sure you didn't break anything