Skip to content

Conversation

@dkijania
Copy link
Member

@dkijania dkijania commented Sep 1, 2025

Added support for jammy codename

@dkijania dkijania self-assigned this Sep 1, 2025
@dkijania dkijania requested a review from a team as a code owner September 1, 2025 11:11
@dkijania
Copy link
Member Author

dkijania commented Sep 1, 2025

!ci-build-me

@dkijania
Copy link
Member Author

dkijania commented Sep 2, 2025

!ci-build-me

@dkijania
Copy link
Member Author

dkijania commented Sep 2, 2025

, tags = [ PipelineTag.Type.Toolchain ]
}
, steps =
[ let toolchainBullseyeSpec =
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think this is just a nit, but the name of this structure is a bit misleading, isn't it? I mean, Bullseye may be deprecated sometime in the future 🤷 what matters to us is the Type.

Anyway, I checked the other MinaToolchainArtifcat*.dhall and it is also there. So I guess not a priority.

@SanabriaRusso
Copy link
Member

Should we update the branch before merge? @dkijania

@dkijania
Copy link
Member Author

dkijania commented Sep 2, 2025

!ci-build-me

@glyh
Copy link
Member

glyh commented Sep 2, 2025

Do we plan to support it officially?

@dkijania
Copy link
Member Author

dkijania commented Sep 2, 2025

Well yes, that's the whole idea. We just need to do it wisely to slowly deprecate bullseye and focal and introduce newer distros

@dkijania
Copy link
Member Author

dkijania commented Sep 2, 2025

!ci-build-me

@glyh
Copy link
Member

glyh commented Sep 2, 2025

Perfect :)

@dkijania dkijania merged commit 114f836 into compatible Sep 2, 2025
64 checks passed
@dkijania dkijania deleted the dkijania/support_for_jammy branch September 2, 2025 11:24
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants