Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
Update index.md
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
  • Loading branch information
fmplaza authored Jun 26, 2024
1 parent f6035b5 commit 202a106
Showing 1 changed file with 4 additions and 4 deletions.
8 changes: 4 additions & 4 deletions content/publication/2024-emotion-analysis-survey/index.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -13,11 +13,11 @@ publishDate: 2023-04-12T17:19:53+01:00
# Legend: 0 = Uncategorized; 1 = Conference paper; 2 = Journal article;
# 3 = Preprint / Working Paper; 4 = Report; 5 = Book; 6 = Book section;
# 7 = Thesis; 8 = Patent
publication_types: ["3"]
publication_types: ["1"]

# Publication name and optional abbreviated publication name.
publication: "arXiv"
publication_short: "arXiv"
publication: "Proceedings of the 2024 Joint International Conference on Computational Linguistics, Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC-COLING 2024)"
publication_short: "LREC-COLING 2024"

abstract: "Emotions are a central aspect of communication. Consequently, emotion analysis (EA) is a rapidly growing field in natural language processing (NLP). However, there is no consensus on scope, direction, or methods. In this paper, we conduct a thorough review of 154 relevant NLP publications from the last decade. Based on this review, we address four different questions: (1) How are EA tasks defined in NLP? (2) What are the most prominent emotion frameworks and which emotions are modeled? (3) Is the subjectivity of emotions considered in terms of demographics and cultural factors? and (4) What are the primary NLP applications for EA? We take stock of trends in EA and tasks, emotion frameworks used, existing datasets, methods, and applications. We then discuss four lacunae: (1) the absence of demographic and cultural aspects does not account for the variation in how emotions are perceived, but instead assumes they are universally experienced in the same manner; (2) the poor fit of emotion categories from the two main emotion theories to the task; (3) the lack of standardized EA terminology hinders gap identification, comparison, and future goals; and (4) the absence of interdisciplinary research isolates EA from insights in other fields. Our work will enable more focused research into EA and a more holistic approach to modeling emotions in NLP."

Expand All @@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ featured: false
# icon_pack: fab
# icon: twitter

url_pdf: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2403.01222.pdf
url_pdf: https://aclanthology.org/2024.lrec-main.506.pdf
url_code:
url_dataset:
url_poster:
Expand Down

0 comments on commit 202a106

Please sign in to comment.