Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove nonexistent storage account property. #124189

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

teo-tsirpanis
Copy link
Contributor

There is only AllowBlobPublicAccess, not AllowBlobAnonymousAccess.

Copy link
Contributor

@teo-tsirpanis : Thanks for your contribution! The author(s) have been notified to review your proposed change.

Copy link
Contributor

Learn Build status updates of commit bfb22d4:

✅ Validation status: passed

File Status Preview URL Details
articles/storage/blobs/anonymous-read-access-overview.md ✅Succeeded

For more details, please refer to the build report.

For any questions, please:

@Court72
Copy link
Contributor

Court72 commented Aug 21, 2024

@akashdubey-ms

Can you review the proposed changes?

Important: When the changes are ready for publication, adding a #sign-off comment is the best way to signal that the PR is ready for the review team to merge.

#label:"aq-pr-triaged"
@MicrosoftDocs/public-repo-pr-review-team

@prmerger-automator prmerger-automator bot added the aq-pr-triaged tracking label for the PR review team label Aug 21, 2024
@PMEds28
Copy link
Contributor

PMEds28 commented Dec 4, 2024

@akashdubey-ms

Can you review this old PR and determine whether it needs to be closed or merged?

@MicrosoftDocs/public-repo-pr-review-team

@Court72
Copy link
Contributor

Court72 commented Jan 10, 2025

I sent an email to the content owner today.

@v-ccolin
Copy link
Contributor

I sent an email to the content owner today.

@MicrosoftDocs/public-repo-pr-review-team

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants