Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

cherry-pick 7.39.0 fix: setApprovalForAll nonce too low (#13142) #13171

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 24, 2025

Conversation

digiwand
Copy link
Contributor

Description

cherry-picks #13142 into 7.39.0

Related issues

Fixes: #13069

Manual testing steps

  1. Go to this page... 2.

Screenshots/Recordings

Before

After

Pre-merge author checklist

Pre-merge reviewer checklist

  • I've manually tested the PR (e.g. pull and build branch, run the app, test code being changed).
  • I confirm that this PR addresses all acceptance criteria described in the ticket it closes and includes the necessary testing evidence such as recordings and or screenshots.

Description

Related issues

Fixes:

Manual testing steps

  1. Go to this page...

Screenshots/Recordings

Before

After

Pre-merge author checklist

Pre-merge reviewer checklist

  • I've manually tested the PR (e.g. pull and build branch, run the app, test code being changed).
  • I confirm that this PR addresses all acceptance criteria described in the ticket it closes and includes the necessary testing evidence such as recordings and or screenshots.

<!--
Please submit this PR as a draft initially.
Do not mark it as "Ready for review" until the template has been
completely filled out, and PR status checks have passed at least once.
-->

## **Description**

I believe this fixes the issue based on previous fix
#6592. This previous fix
was [undone](#9888)
about 7 months ago. The issue may have existed since the 7.26 release

## **Related issues**

Fixes: #13069

## **Manual testing steps**

1. Go to this page...
2.
3.

## **Screenshots/Recordings**

<!-- If applicable, add screenshots and/or recordings to visualize the
before and after of your change. -->

### **Before**

<!-- [screenshots/recordings] -->

### **After**

<!-- [screenshots/recordings] -->

## **Pre-merge author checklist**

- [ ] I’ve followed [MetaMask Contributor
Docs](https://github.com/MetaMask/contributor-docs) and [MetaMask Mobile
Coding
Standards](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-mobile/blob/main/.github/guidelines/CODING_GUIDELINES.md).
- [ ] I've completed the PR template to the best of my ability
- [ ] I’ve included tests if applicable
- [ ] I’ve documented my code using [JSDoc](https://jsdoc.app/) format
if applicable
- [ ] I’ve applied the right labels on the PR (see [labeling
guidelines](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-mobile/blob/main/.github/guidelines/LABELING_GUIDELINES.md)).
Not required for external contributors.

## **Pre-merge reviewer checklist**

- [ ] I've manually tested the PR (e.g. pull and build branch, run the
app, test code being changed).
- [ ] I confirm that this PR addresses all acceptance criteria described
in the ticket it closes and includes the necessary testing evidence such
as recordings and or screenshots.
@digiwand digiwand requested a review from a team as a code owner January 24, 2025 13:51
Copy link
Contributor

CLA Signature Action: All authors have signed the CLA. You may need to manually re-run the blocking PR check if it doesn't pass in a few minutes.

@metamaskbot metamaskbot added the team-confirmations Push issues to confirmations team label Jan 24, 2025
@digiwand digiwand merged commit ef0a8d7 into release/7.39.0 Jan 24, 2025
39 of 40 checks passed
@digiwand digiwand deleted the cp-7.39.0-setApprovalForAll-nonce-too-low branch January 24, 2025 14:18
@github-actions github-actions bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Jan 24, 2025
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
rc-cherry-picked team-confirmations Push issues to confirmations team
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants