feat: STAKE-914 Remove MM_POOLED_STAKING_UI_ENABLED feature flag

[Matt561]

Description

This PR removes the MM_POOLED_STAKING_UI_ENABLED feature flag, removed related usages in the codebase, and updates breaking tests. We no longer need this feature flag as pooled-staking is live.

Related issues

• Jira ticket: STAKE-914 Remove MM_POOLED_STAKING_UI_ENABLED feature flag

Manual testing steps

N/A

Screenshots/Recordings

Before

N/A

After

N/A

Pre-merge author checklist

• I’ve followed MetaMask Contributor Docs and MetaMask Mobile Coding Standards.
• I've completed the PR template to the best of my ability
• I’ve included tests if applicable
• I’ve documented my code using JSDoc format if applicable
• I’ve applied the right labels on the PR (see labeling guidelines). Not required for external contributors.

Pre-merge reviewer checklist

• I've manually tested the PR (e.g. pull and build branch, run the app, test code being changed).
• I confirm that this PR addresses all acceptance criteria described in the ticket it closes and includes the necessary testing evidence such as recordings and or screenshots.

[github-actions]

CLA Signature Action: All authors have signed the CLA. You may need to manually re-run the blocking PR check if it doesn't pass in a few minutes.

[github-actions]

Bitrise

❌❌❌ pr_smoke_e2e_pipeline failed on Bitrise! ❌❌❌

Commit hash: 811f258
Build link: https://app.bitrise.io/app/be69d4368ee7e86d/pipelines/46d68023-eadd-4919-b4f3-156ee7625753

Note

• You can kick off another pr_smoke_e2e_pipeline on Bitrise by removing and re-applying the Run Smoke E2E label on the pull request

Tip

• Check the documentation if you have any doubts on how to understand the failure on bitrise

[github-actions]

Bitrise

✅✅✅ pr_smoke_e2e_pipeline passed on Bitrise! ✅✅✅

Commit hash: 6fa36d8
Build link: https://app.bitrise.io/app/be69d4368ee7e86d/pipelines/098e3ea8-f1e1-4bbe-a971-23a6dd7ccf7a

Note

• You can kick off another pr_smoke_e2e_pipeline on Bitrise by removing and re-applying the Run Smoke E2E label on the pull request

[amitabh94]

LGTM!

[tommasini]

LGTM! Pooled staking alive <3

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 60.00000% with 2 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 59.78%. Comparing base (6b68dd7) to head (561c1e7).
Report is 8 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
...nts/UI/AssetOverview/TokenDetails/TokenDetails.tsx	0.00%	0 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
...ents/UI/Stake/components/StakingEarnings/index.tsx	0.00%	0 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main   #12852      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   59.72%   59.78%   +0.05%     
==========================================
  Files        1865     1867       +2     
  Lines       42011    42039      +28     
  Branches     5458     5456       -2     
==========================================
+ Hits        25093    25133      +40     
+ Misses      15239    15234       -5     
+ Partials     1679     1672       -7     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[github-actions]

Bitrise

❌❌❌ pr_smoke_e2e_pipeline failed on Bitrise! ❌❌❌

Commit hash: e527c97
Build link: https://app.bitrise.io/app/be69d4368ee7e86d/pipelines/b63628f7-fc29-4e96-b685-d2400e7d9fd1

Note

• You can kick off another pr_smoke_e2e_pipeline on Bitrise by removing and re-applying the Run Smoke E2E label on the pull request

Tip

• Check the documentation if you have any doubts on how to understand the failure on bitrise

[github-actions]

Bitrise

✅✅✅ pr_smoke_e2e_pipeline passed on Bitrise! ✅✅✅

Commit hash: 561c1e7
Build link: https://app.bitrise.io/app/be69d4368ee7e86d/pipelines/f3c20077-ef9c-4c02-81cb-5aff520a4d9d

Note

• You can kick off another pr_smoke_e2e_pipeline on Bitrise by removing and re-applying the Run Smoke E2E label on the pull request

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
88.9% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud