Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Bug]: API Requests Unordered - Whenever I perform different wallet API requests from different dapps, those don't appear ordered sequentially based on the order of myactions #28102

Closed
seaona opened this issue Oct 25, 2024 · 1 comment · Fixed by #28090
Labels
regression-prod-12.5.0 Regression bug that was found in production in release 12.5.0 release-12.5.0 Issue or pull request that will be included in release 12.5.0 release-12.7.0 Issue or pull request that will be included in release 12.7.0 Sev2-normal Normal severity; minor loss of service or inconvenience. team-wallet-api-platform type-bug

Comments

@seaona
Copy link
Contributor

seaona commented Oct 25, 2024

Describe the bug

Whenever I perform different wallet API requests from different dapps, those don't appear ordered sequentially.

Expected behavior

Not 100% sure but, I think requests should be ordered sequentially based in the order of the request happening? (first request appears first, second request appears second, and so on) ?

@adonesky1 and the wallet api team can confirm what's the expected behaviour here

Screenshots/Recordings

Example 1:

  1. Dapp1: eth_signTypedData_v4
  2. Dapp1: wallet_addEthereumChain
  3. Dapp2: personal_sign

Resulting order:

  1. Dapp1: eth_signTypedData_v4 --confirm/cancel
  2. Dapp2: personal_sign --confirm/cancel
  3. Dapp1: wallet_addEthereumChain
order-reqs.mp4

Example 1:

  1. Dapp1: eth_signTypedData_v4 x10
  2. Dapp2: wallet_requestPermissions

Resulting order:

  1. Dapp1: eth_signTypedData_v4 x10 --confirm/cancel
  2. Dapp2: wallet_requestPermissions --confirm(if in the same network)/cancel
  3. The remaining 9 signatures Dapp1: eth_signTypedData_v4 x9
    https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/2288e2ff-dd3e-4113-94fa-8d89bde2c29d

Steps to reproduce

See above

Error messages or log output

No response

Detection stage

In production (default)

Version

12.5.0

Build type

None

Browser

Chrome

Operating system

Linux

Hardware wallet

No response

Additional context

No response

Severity

No response

@seaona seaona added type-bug Sev2-normal Normal severity; minor loss of service or inconvenience. team-wallet-api-platform release-12.5.0 Issue or pull request that will be included in release 12.5.0 labels Oct 25, 2024
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this to To be fixed in Bugs by team Oct 25, 2024
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this to To be fixed in Bugs by severity Oct 25, 2024
@metamaskbot metamaskbot added the regression-prod-12.5.0 Regression bug that was found in production in release 12.5.0 label Oct 25, 2024
@Gudahtt
Copy link
Member

Gudahtt commented Oct 30, 2024

This appears to be resolved by #28090 as well

@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from To be fixed to Fixed in Bugs by team Oct 30, 2024
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from To be fixed to Fixed in Bugs by severity Oct 30, 2024
@metamaskbot metamaskbot added the release-12.7.0 Issue or pull request that will be included in release 12.7.0 label Oct 30, 2024
Gudahtt added a commit that referenced this issue Oct 30, 2024
This is a cherry-pick of #28090 for v12.6.0. Original description:

<!--
Please submit this PR as a draft initially.
Do not mark it as "Ready for review" until the template has been
completely filled out, and PR status checks have passed at least once.
-->

## **Description**

Bumps `@metamask/queued-request-controller` to fix queueing issue with
Chain Permission `wallet_switchEthereumChain` and
`wallet_addEthereumChain` when switching to a previously permitted chain
and with `wallet_addEthereumChain` not being enqueued when it still
should be.

[![Open in GitHub
Codespaces](https://github.com/codespaces/badge.svg)](https://codespaces.new/MetaMask/metamask-extension/pull/28090?quickstart=1)

## **Related issues**

Related: MetaMask/core#4846
Fixes: #28101
Fixes: #27977
Fixes: #28102

## **Manual testing steps**

The easiest way to test this would be a combination of using the test
dapp and the following request to switch chains
```
await window.ethereum.request({
 "method": "wallet_switchEthereumChain",
 "params": [
  {
    chainId: "0x1"
  }
],
});
```

The behaviors you should see include:
**One dapp:**
* On a dapp permissioned for chain A and B, on chain A, queue up several
send transactions, then use wallet_switchEthereumChain to switch to
chain B. The send transactions should NOT get cleared immediately after
requesting the chain switch. Chain switch should NOT happen until the
previous approvals are approved/rejected.
* On a dapp permissioned for chain A and B, on chain A, queue up one
send transaction, then use wallet_switchEthereumChain to switch to chain
B, then queue up several more send transactions. Reject/approve the
first transaction. Afterwards, you should see chain B as the active
chain for the dapp, and all subsequent approvals cleared/rejected
automatically.
* On a dapp permissioned for ONLY chain A, on chain A, queue up one send
transaction, then use wallet_switchEthereumChain to switch to chain B,
then queue up several more send transactions. Reject/approve the first
transaction. Afterwards, you should an approval prompt for adding chain
B. If you approve it, the dapp should then be on chain B, with all
subsequent approvals cleared/rejected. If you disapprove it, you should
be prompted with the subsequent approvals.
* On a dapp permissioned for ONLY chain A, on chain A,
wallet_switchEthereumChain to switch to chain B, then queue up several
more send transactions. Reject/approve the first transaction.
Afterwards, you should an approval prompt for adding chain B. If you
approve it, the dapp should then be on chain B, with all subsequent
approvals cleared/rejected. If you disapprove it, you should be prompted
with the subsequent approvals.

**Two dapps:**
* On a dapp permissioned for chain A, on chain A, queue up several send
transactions, On a separate dapp permissioned for chain A and B, on
chain A, use wallet_switchEthereumChain to switch to chain B. The send
transactions should NOT get cleared immediately after requesting the
chain switch. Chain switch should NOT happen until the previous
approvals are approved/rejected.
* On a dapp permissioned for chain A and B, on chain A, queue up one
send transaction. On a separate dapp permissioned for chain A and B, on
chain A, use wallet_switchEthereumChain to switch to chain B. Then on
the first dapp queue up several more send transactions. Reject/approve
the first transaction. Afterwards, you should see chain B as the active
chain for the second dapp, and then you should still be prompted with
the subsequent approvals for the first dapp.
* One one dapp, start a wallet_addEthereumChain for a chain that does
not exist in the wallet and leave the approval alone. On a different
dapp, do the same thing. Only the request from the first dapp should be
accessible (i.e. no scrubbing between both of them). After rejecting the
first request, the second request should then appear (which will look
exactly the same of course). Wallet should not lock up if you repeat
this and accept either of the requests

## **Screenshots/Recordings**

<!-- If applicable, add screenshots and/or recordings to visualize the
before and after of your change. -->

### **Before**

<!-- [screenshots/recordings] -->

### **After**


https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/2634119f-67db-4866-8520-9320a9400b1d



https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/c78c13ab-ea4f-4420-bccc-70959786e8db



## **Pre-merge author checklist**

- [ ] I've followed [MetaMask Contributor
Docs](https://github.com/MetaMask/contributor-docs) and [MetaMask
Extension Coding
Standards](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-extension/blob/develop/.github/guidelines/CODING_GUIDELINES.md).
- [ ] I've completed the PR template to the best of my ability
- [ ] I’ve included tests if applicable
- [ ] I’ve documented my code using [JSDoc](https://jsdoc.app/) format
if applicable
- [ ] I’ve applied the right labels on the PR (see [labeling
guidelines](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-extension/blob/develop/.github/guidelines/LABELING_GUIDELINES.md)).
Not required for external contributors.

## **Pre-merge reviewer checklist**

- [ ] I've manually tested the PR (e.g. pull and build branch, run the
app, test code being changed).
- [ ] I confirm that this PR addresses all acceptance criteria described
in the ticket it closes and includes the necessary testing evidence such
as recordings and or screenshots.

---------

Co-authored-by: jiexi <jiexiluan@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: MetaMask Bot <metamaskbot@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
regression-prod-12.5.0 Regression bug that was found in production in release 12.5.0 release-12.5.0 Issue or pull request that will be included in release 12.5.0 release-12.7.0 Issue or pull request that will be included in release 12.7.0 Sev2-normal Normal severity; minor loss of service or inconvenience. team-wallet-api-platform type-bug
Projects
Archived in project
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants