Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Introduce offsetOpenMesh #3607

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Nov 4, 2024
Merged

Introduce offsetOpenMesh #3607

merged 3 commits into from
Nov 4, 2024

Conversation

Grantim
Copy link
Contributor

@Grantim Grantim commented Nov 4, 2024

No description provided.

@Grantim Grantim requested a review from Fedr November 4, 2024 14:45
}
else
{
// resMesh already has opposite normals
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

if it is already has, then why do we flip?

resMesh.addPart( mesh );
}

resMesh.invalidateCaches();
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

do we need it after addPart and addPartByMask?

@Grantim Grantim merged commit 7ed0046 into master Nov 4, 2024
22 checks passed
@Grantim Grantim deleted the Introduce_offsetOpenMesh branch November 4, 2024 17:55
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants