-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 743
Update agents.py to work with newer chainlit versions #639
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
WalkthroughThe update changes the structure and labeling of items in the Changes
Poem
✨ Finishing Touches
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Summary of Changes
Hello @krkead, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
This pull request updates the agents.py file to ensure compatibility with recent versions of the Chainlit library. The primary change involves adjusting how UI actions are defined to match the updated Chainlit API for action payloads and labels.
Highlights
- Chainlit Compatibility: Updated the definition of
cl.Actionobjects to use dictionary payloads ({"value": ...}) instead of string payloads, aligning with changes in newer Chainlit versions. - UI Label Simplification: Simplified the labels for the 'run' and 'modify' actions, removing emojis and special characters.
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
| Feature | Command | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
| Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
| Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
| Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configureGemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
PR Reviewer Guide 🔍Here are some key observations to aid the review process:
|
PR Code Suggestions ✨Explore these optional code suggestions:
|
|||||||||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This pull request effectively addresses compatibility issues with newer Chainlit versions by updating the action payload format. The simplification of action labels by removing emojis and the addition of the missing newline at the end of the file are also good improvements for code clarity and standards.
My main suggestion focuses on ensuring consistent capitalization for the updated action labels to enhance UI professionalism and maintainability.
| cl.Action(name="run", payload={"value": "run"}, label="run"), | ||
| cl.Action(name="modify", payload={"value": "modify"}, label="Modify"), |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The action labels "run" and "Modify" have inconsistent capitalization. For better UI consistency, it's recommended to use the same capitalization style for all action labels. Given that "Modify" is capitalized, consider changing "run" to "Run".
Alternatively, if the intent is to use lowercase for all simplified labels, then "Modify" could be changed to "modify". However, title case ("Run", "Modify") is generally more common for button labels.
| cl.Action(name="run", payload={"value": "run"}, label="run"), | |
| cl.Action(name="modify", payload={"value": "modify"}, label="Modify"), | |
| cl.Action(name="run", payload={"value": "run"}, label="Run"), | |
| cl.Action(name="modify", payload={"value": "modify"}, label="Modify"), |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
src/praisonai/praisonai/ui/agents.py (2)
20-21: Update Action payloads and labels for Chainlit vX compatibilityPayloads are correctly converted to dictionaries (
{"value": ...}) per the newer Chainlit API, and emojis removed. Consider standardizing label casing (e.g., use "Run" instead of "run") for consistency across the UI.
822-822: Notify user on final settings update failureAdding a final
cl.Message(...).send()ensures the user is informed when all retries fail. Consider specifyingauthor="System"to align with existing system messages.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
src/praisonai/praisonai/ui/agents.py(2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code Graph Analysis (1)
src/praisonai/praisonai/ui/agents.py (1)
src/praisonai/praisonai/ui/realtimeclient/__init__.py (1)
send(177-203)
PR Type
Bug fix
Description
• Update Chainlit action payload format for compatibility
• Simplify action labels and remove emoji icons
• Add missing newline at end of file
Changes walkthrough 📝
agents.py
Update Chainlit action configurationsrc/praisonai/praisonai/ui/agents.py
• Changed action payload from string to dictionary format
• Updated
action labels removing emojis and simplifying text
• Added missing
newline at end of file
Summary by CodeRabbit