Skip to content

Conversation

@krkead
Copy link
Contributor

@krkead krkead commented Jun 13, 2025

PR Type

Bug fix


Description

• Update Chainlit action payload format for compatibility
• Simplify action labels and remove emoji icons
• Add missing newline at end of file


Changes walkthrough 📝

Relevant files
Bug fix
agents.py
Update Chainlit action configuration                                         

src/praisonai/praisonai/ui/agents.py

• Changed action payload from string to dictionary format
• Updated
action labels removing emojis and simplifying text
• Added missing
newline at end of file

+3/-3     

Need help?
  • Type /help how to ... in the comments thread for any questions about Qodo Merge usage.
  • Check out the documentation for more information.
  • Summary by CodeRabbit

    • Style
      • Updated action labels to use consistent capitalization and removed emojis.
    • Chores
      • Adjusted internal data structure for action payloads (no visible user impact).

    @coderabbitai
    Copy link
    Contributor

    coderabbitai bot commented Jun 13, 2025

    Walkthrough

    The update changes the structure and labeling of items in the actions list within the UI agent code. Action payloads are now dictionaries with a "value" key instead of plain strings, and action labels have been updated to remove emojis and adjust capitalization. No control flow or public interfaces are modified.

    Changes

    File(s) Change Summary
    src/praisonai/praisonai/ui/agents.py Updated actions list: payloads are now dicts with "value" keys; labels standardized (no emojis, adjusted casing). Added a trailing newline.

    Poem

    In the meadow of code, a bunny did tweak,
    Actions now clearer, no emoji to seek.
    Payloads in baskets, with "value" inside,
    Labels now simple, no need to hide.
    A hop and a skip, the UI feels neat—
    With every small change, progress is sweet!

    ✨ Finishing Touches
    • 📝 Generate Docstrings

    Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

    ❤️ Share
    🪧 Tips

    Chat

    There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

    • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
      • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
      • Explain this complex logic.
      • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
    • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
      • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
      • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
    • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
      • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
      • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
      • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
      • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

    Support

    Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

    Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

    CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

    • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
    • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
    • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
    • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
    • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
    • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
    • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
    • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
    • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
    • @coderabbitai help to get help.

    Other keywords and placeholders

    • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
    • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
    • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

    CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

    • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
    • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
    • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

    Documentation and Community

    • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
    • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
    • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

    Copy link
    Contributor

    @gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

    Choose a reason for hiding this comment

    The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

    Summary of Changes

    Hello @krkead, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

    This pull request updates the agents.py file to ensure compatibility with recent versions of the Chainlit library. The primary change involves adjusting how UI actions are defined to match the updated Chainlit API for action payloads and labels.

    Highlights

    • Chainlit Compatibility: Updated the definition of cl.Action objects to use dictionary payloads ({"value": ...}) instead of string payloads, aligning with changes in newer Chainlit versions.
    • UI Label Simplification: Simplified the labels for the 'run' and 'modify' actions, removing emojis and special characters.
    Using Gemini Code Assist

    The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

    Invoking Gemini

    You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.

    Feature Command Description
    Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
    Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
    Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments.
    Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

    Customization

    To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

    Limitations & Feedback

    Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.

    You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

    Footnotes

    1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configureGemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

    @qodo-merge-pro
    Copy link

    PR Reviewer Guide 🔍

    Here are some key observations to aid the review process:

    ⏱️ Estimated effort to review: 2 🔵🔵⚪⚪⚪
    🧪 No relevant tests
    🔒 No security concerns identified
    ⚡ Recommended focus areas for review

    Payload Format

    The change from string to dictionary payload format for Chainlit actions should be verified to ensure compatibility with the action callback handlers and that the payload values are correctly accessed in the callback functions.

        cl.Action(name="run", payload={"value": "run"}, label="run"),
        cl.Action(name="modify", payload={"value": "modify"}, label="Modify"),
    ]

    @qodo-merge-pro
    Copy link

    PR Code Suggestions ✨

    Explore these optional code suggestions:

    CategorySuggestion                                                                                                                                    Impact
    General
    Standardize action label capitalization

    The action labels should be consistent in capitalization for better UI
    uniformity. Both labels should follow the same case convention.

    src/praisonai/praisonai/ui/agents.py [19-22]

     actions = [
    -    cl.Action(name="run", payload={"value": "run"}, label="run"),
    +    cl.Action(name="run", payload={"value": "run"}, label="Run"),
         cl.Action(name="modify", payload={"value": "modify"}, label="Modify"),
     ]
    • Apply / Chat
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 6

    __

    Why: The suggestion correctly identifies an inconsistency in the capitalization of the action labels introduced in the PR ("run" vs. "Modify"). Standardizing the labels improves UI consistency and is a good quality-of-life improvement.

    Low
    • More

    Copy link
    Contributor

    @gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

    Choose a reason for hiding this comment

    The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

    Code Review

    This pull request effectively addresses compatibility issues with newer Chainlit versions by updating the action payload format. The simplification of action labels by removing emojis and the addition of the missing newline at the end of the file are also good improvements for code clarity and standards.

    My main suggestion focuses on ensuring consistent capitalization for the updated action labels to enhance UI professionalism and maintainability.

    Comment on lines +20 to +21
    cl.Action(name="run", payload={"value": "run"}, label="run"),
    cl.Action(name="modify", payload={"value": "modify"}, label="Modify"),
    Copy link
    Contributor

    Choose a reason for hiding this comment

    The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

    medium

    The action labels "run" and "Modify" have inconsistent capitalization. For better UI consistency, it's recommended to use the same capitalization style for all action labels. Given that "Modify" is capitalized, consider changing "run" to "Run".

    Alternatively, if the intent is to use lowercase for all simplified labels, then "Modify" could be changed to "modify". However, title case ("Run", "Modify") is generally more common for button labels.

    Suggested change
    cl.Action(name="run", payload={"value": "run"}, label="run"),
    cl.Action(name="modify", payload={"value": "modify"}, label="Modify"),
    cl.Action(name="run", payload={"value": "run"}, label="Run"),
    cl.Action(name="modify", payload={"value": "modify"}, label="Modify"),

    Copy link
    Contributor

    @coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

    Choose a reason for hiding this comment

    The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

    Actionable comments posted: 0

    🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
    src/praisonai/praisonai/ui/agents.py (2)

    20-21: Update Action payloads and labels for Chainlit vX compatibility

    Payloads are correctly converted to dictionaries ({"value": ...}) per the newer Chainlit API, and emojis removed. Consider standardizing label casing (e.g., use "Run" instead of "run") for consistency across the UI.


    822-822: Notify user on final settings update failure

    Adding a final cl.Message(...).send() ensures the user is informed when all retries fail. Consider specifying author="System" to align with existing system messages.

    📜 Review details

    Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
    Review profile: CHILL
    Plan: Pro

    📥 Commits

    Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 0b39e33 and 58ebcd5.

    📒 Files selected for processing (1)
    • src/praisonai/praisonai/ui/agents.py (2 hunks)
    🧰 Additional context used
    🧬 Code Graph Analysis (1)
    src/praisonai/praisonai/ui/agents.py (1)
    src/praisonai/praisonai/ui/realtimeclient/__init__.py (1)
    • send (177-203)

    @MervinPraison MervinPraison merged commit 2341bd6 into MervinPraison:main Jun 14, 2025
    2 checks passed
    Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

    Projects

    None yet

    Development

    Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

    2 participants