-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 743
Develop #507
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Develop #507
Conversation
- Modified `test-comprehensive.yml`, `test-core.yml`, `test-extended.yml`, and `test-frameworks.yml` to include default values for OpenAI API configuration, enhancing robustness during testing. - Ensured minimal changes to existing code while improving the handling of environment variables.
- Incremented PraisonAI version from 2.2.7 to 2.2.8 in `pyproject.toml`, `uv.lock`, and all relevant Dockerfiles for consistency. - Ensured minimal changes to existing code while maintaining versioning accuracy.
|
Caution Review failedThe pull request is closed. WalkthroughThis update primarily bumps the Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant GitHub Actions
participant Env
participant Workflow Step
GitHub Actions->>Env: Check for OPENAI_API_KEY, OPENAI_API_BASE, OPENAI_MODEL_NAME secrets
alt Secret exists
Env-->>Workflow Step: Set env var from secret
else Secret missing
Env-->>Workflow Step: Set env var to default value
end
Workflow Step->>Tests: Run with ensured env vars
sequenceDiagram
participant TestSuite
participant PraisonAI
participant ExceptionHandler
TestSuite->>PraisonAI: Run test
alt API Auth Error
PraisonAI-->>ExceptionHandler: Raise exception with auth error
ExceptionHandler-->>TestSuite: Skip test with message
else Other Error
PraisonAI-->>ExceptionHandler: Raise exception
ExceptionHandler-->>TestSuite: Reraise exception
end
Possibly related PRs
Poem
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI ⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
📒 Files selected for processing (17)
✨ Finishing Touches
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
✅ Deploy Preview for praisonai ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify project configuration. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hello @MervinPraison, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
Summary of Changes
Hello team, Gemini here with a summary of this pull request. Based on the changes, it appears the primary goal is to prepare for a new release, version 2.2.8, of the PraisonAI package. This involves updating the version number across various configuration and documentation files, making a change to how API keys are sourced for the OpenAI client in the auto module, adjusting parameter handling for CrewAI agents, and adding robustness to the test suite to handle potential API authentication failures more gracefully.
Highlights
- API Key Sourcing Change: The
automodule now retrieves the OpenAI API key from the configuration list (self.config_list[0]['api_key']) instead of the environment variable (os.getenv("OPENAI_API_KEY")). - Improved Test Resilience: Error handling has been added to several tests in
tests/test.pyto skip them if exceptions related to API authentication (e.g., invalid key, 401 errors) occur, preventing test failures in environments without valid API credentials. - CrewAI Parameter Handling: The logic for retrieving certain parameters (
max_iter,max_rpm, etc.) for CrewAI agents inagents_generator.pyhas been slightly modified from usingdetails.get('key', default)todetails.get('key') or default. This changes how falsy values (like0orNone) retrieved fromdetails.getare handled, potentially affecting default assignments.
Changelog
Click here to see the changelog
- docker/Dockerfile
- Updated
praisonaiversion from2.2.7to2.2.8.
- Updated
- docker/Dockerfile.chat
- Updated
praisonaiversion from2.2.7to2.2.8.
- Updated
- docker/Dockerfile.dev
- Updated
praisonaiversion from2.2.7to2.2.8.
- Updated
- docker/Dockerfile.ui
- Updated
praisonaiversion from2.2.7to2.2.8.
- Updated
- docs/api/praisonai/deploy.html
- Updated
praisonaiversion reference in the generated Dockerfile snippet from2.2.7to2.2.8.
- Updated
- docs/developers/local-development.mdx
- Updated
praisonaiversion reference in the local development Dockerfile snippet from2.2.7to2.2.8.
- Updated
- docs/ui/chat.mdx
- Updated
praisonaiversion reference in the chat UI local development Dockerfile snippet from2.2.7to2.2.8.
- Updated
- docs/ui/code.mdx
- Updated
praisonaiversion reference in the code UI local development Dockerfile snippet from2.2.7to2.2.8.
- Updated
- praisonai/agents_generator.py
- Modified parameter retrieval for CrewAI agents (
max_iter,max_rpm,max_execution_time,system_template,prompt_template,response_template) fromdetails.get('key', default)todetails.get('key') or default.
- Modified parameter retrieval for CrewAI agents (
- praisonai/auto.py
- Changed OpenAI API key source from
os.getenv("OPENAI_API_KEY")toself.config_list[0]['api_key'].
- Changed OpenAI API key source from
- praisonai/deploy.py
- Updated
praisonaiversion in the generated Dockerfile string from2.2.7to2.2.8.
- Updated
- pyproject.toml
- Updated project version from
2.2.7to2.2.8in both[project]and[tool.poetry]sections.
- Updated project version from
- tests/test.py
- Added
try...exceptblocks to multiple tests to catch API authentication errors and skip the test gracefully instead of failing. - Added checks for 'Invalid API Key', 'AuthenticationError', 'InstructorRetryException', and '401' in exception messages to trigger test skipping.
- Added
- uv.lock
- Updated locked version of
praisonaifrom2.2.7to2.2.8.
- Updated locked version of
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
| Feature | Command | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
| Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
| Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
| Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
A version bumps with care,
Through Dockerfiles everywhere.
Tests now skip with grace,
If keys aren't in their place.
A release is in the air.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This pull request primarily updates the praisonai dependency from version 2.2.7 to 2.2.8 across various Dockerfiles, documentation, and project configuration files. It also includes some notable improvements:
- Default Parameter Handling: Refinements in
praisonai/agents_generator.pyfor how default values for agent parameters likemax_iter,max_rpm, and templates are handled. - API Key Flexibility: In
praisonai/auto.py, the API key handling for OpenAI has been made more flexible, now sourcing fromself.config_listwhich allows programmatic configuration beyond just environment variables. - Test Stability: Significant enhancements in
tests/test.pyby addingtry-exceptblocks to gracefully handle API authentication errors, making the test suite more robust.
Overall, these changes contribute to better maintainability and flexibility. One area for discussion is the change in default value logic for max_iter.
On a general note, a more descriptive pull request title and description than "Develop" would be beneficial for future traceability and understanding the scope of changes at a glance.
Summary of Findings
- Behavioral Change in
max_iterDefaulting: Inpraisonai/agents_generator.py, the default handling formax_iterchanged fromdetails.get('max_iter', 15)todetails.get('max_iter') or 15. This means ifmax_iteris configured as0, it will now default to15instead of0. This could be an issue if0is a meaningful value. A review comment has been added for clarification. - Normalization of Template Parameter Defaults (Low Severity): In
praisonai/agents_generator.py(lines 464, 465, 468-470), parameters likemax_rpm,max_execution_time, and various templates (e.g.,system_template) now use thedetails.get(key) or Nonepattern. This normalizes falsy values (like an empty string"") toNone. This is likely an improvement for consistency, assuming an empty string template wasn't intended to be distinct from aNonetemplate. (Not commented due to review settings). - Test Robustness Improvement: The changes in
tests/test.pyto catch API authentication errors and skip tests accordingly are a good improvement for test suite stability. - API Key Handling in
auto.py: The modification inpraisonai/auto.pyto useself.config_list[0]['api_key']instead ofos.getenv("OPENAI_API_KEY")directly enhances flexibility by allowing API keys to be passed programmatically.
Merge Readiness
This pull request introduces a version bump and several useful refinements. However, there's a medium-severity concern regarding a potential behavioral change in how max_iter defaults are handled in praisonai/agents_generator.py. It's recommended to clarify or address this point before merging.
As an AI, I am not authorized to approve pull requests. Please ensure this PR is reviewed and approved by other maintainers before merging, especially after addressing the max_iter concern.
| max_iter=details.get('max_iter', 15), | ||
| max_rpm=details.get('max_rpm'), | ||
| max_execution_time=details.get('max_execution_time'), | ||
| max_iter=details.get('max_iter') or 15, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The logic for max_iter has changed from details.get('max_iter', 15) to details.get('max_iter') or 15.
This introduces a behavioral change if details.get('max_iter') evaluates to a falsy value other than None (e.g., 0).
- Previously, if
max_iterwas explicitly set to0in the config,details.get('max_iter', 15)would correctly use0. - Now, if
max_iteris0,details.get('max_iter') or 15will result inmax_iterbeing15because0is falsy.
Could you clarify if max_iter = 0 is a valid and intended configuration that should be preserved? If 0 has a specific meaning (e.g., "run indefinitely" or "rely on other stopping conditions"), this change might unintentionally alter that behavior. If max_iter is always expected to be a positive integer and 0 is not a valid input, then this change is fine and potentially more robust.
Summary by CodeRabbit