Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

ci: Reduce the concurrency of the parallel-workload-dml scenario #21831

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 20, 2023
Merged

ci: Reduce the concurrency of the parallel-workload-dml scenario #21831

merged 1 commit into from
Sep 20, 2023

Conversation

philip-stoev
Copy link
Contributor

Required in order to avoid OOMs

Motivation

Tips for reviewer

Checklist

  • This PR has adequate test coverage / QA involvement has been duly considered.
  • This PR has an associated up-to-date design doc, is a design doc (template), or is sufficiently small to not require a design.
  • If this PR evolves an existing $T ⇔ Proto$T mapping (possibly in a backwards-incompatible way), then it is tagged with a T-proto label.
  • If this PR will require changes to cloud orchestration or tests, there is a companion cloud PR to account for those changes that is tagged with the release-blocker label (example).
  • This PR includes the following user-facing behavior changes:

@philip-stoev philip-stoev requested a review from a team as a code owner September 20, 2023 08:08
@philip-stoev philip-stoev requested review from def- and removed request for a team September 20, 2023 08:08
@philip-stoev philip-stoev merged commit e65dfb7 into MaterializeInc:main Sep 20, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@def- def- def- approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@philip-stoev @def-