Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Correct string/number comparison in dataflow visualization #21773

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Sep 16, 2023

Conversation

antiguru
Copy link
Member

Motivation

This PR fixes a previously unreported bug: Fix dataflow graph rendering. With #21664 we changed how numbers are encoded, which moved the encoding of numbers from JSON numbers to strings. This broke some comparison in the memory visualizer.

Checklist

  • This PR has adequate test coverage / QA involvement has been duly considered.
  • This PR has an associated up-to-date design doc, is a design doc (template), or is sufficiently small to not require a design.
  • If this PR evolves an existing $T ⇔ Proto$T mapping (possibly in a backwards-incompatible way), then it is tagged with a T-proto label.
  • If this PR will require changes to cloud orchestration or tests, there is a companion cloud PR to account for those changes that is tagged with the release-blocker label (example).
  • This PR includes the following user-facing behavior changes:

@antiguru antiguru requested a review from a team as a code owner September 15, 2023 18:33
@antiguru antiguru added the release-blocker Critical issue that should block *any* release if not fixed label Sep 15, 2023
Signed-off-by: Moritz Hoffmann <mh@materialize.com>
Signed-off-by: Moritz Hoffmann <mh@materialize.com>
@antiguru antiguru merged commit 865c553 into MaterializeInc:main Sep 16, 2023
@antiguru antiguru deleted the mem-viz-fix branch September 16, 2023 15:50
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
release-blocker Critical issue that should block *any* release if not fixed
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants