Skip to content

brought snippets more into alignment with language atom #92

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed

Conversation

tennyson-mccalla
Copy link
Contributor

I created this pull request to bring MagicPython's snippets back in line with the ones in Atom's language-python package.

In accordance with the advice from this closed pull request I got the additions folded into language-python first (see here).

Originally I was only going to add my "env3" and "sc" snippets but when I saw that the language-python package was ahead I went on and added import, from/import, with statement, rPDB, and PuDB.

Potential Issues

This brings the atom snippets out of alignment with the sublime snippets. I'm not good enough with sublime-snippet yet so I hope that someone else writes that up soon.

@1st1
Copy link
Member

1st1 commented Jul 19, 2017

Could you please rebase your PR onto the recent master?

@tennyson-mccalla
Copy link
Contributor Author

Will do. Thanks.

@1st1
Copy link
Member

1st1 commented Jul 19, 2017

Thanks, closing this in favour of #92.

@1st1 1st1 closed this Jul 19, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants