Support OpenRouter models endpoint #356
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
SplittyDev
force-pushed
the
upstream/openrouter-list-models
branch
from
e97d121 to
4ca0591
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What
This PR makes the
/modelsendpoint work with OpenRouter.Why
Unlike OpenAI, OpenRouter doesn't use the
objectandowned_byfields.I've chosen to use reasonable defaults for
object(i.e.listinModelsResultandmodelinModelResult), and an empty string forowned_by, since I don't think there's a better default for that one.The
ModelsResultandModelResultstructs themselves aren't changed, and this PR makes use of the existingparsingOptionsmechanism to supply the default values.Affected Areas
ModelsResultandModelResult, if relaxed parsing options are specified