Skip to content

Multi-Role Comparative Reasoning #6

@MSicc

Description

@MSicc

Summary

Allow optional multi-role responses for complex review scenarios.

Motivation

Comparative outputs help evaluate trade-offs and improve decisions.

Proposed Approach

  • Define when multi-role output is appropriate.
  • Provide formatting guidance (clear role headers).
  • Require user confirmation if it changes output format.

Acceptance Criteria

  • Spec section includes example with at least two roles.
  • Guidance on avoiding confusion or overuse.
  • Templates and prompt workflows updated to reflect spec changes, with validation passing.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions