Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[MRG] fix typos #137

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 26, 2024
Merged

[MRG] fix typos #137

merged 1 commit into from
Aug 26, 2024

Conversation

HuaizhengZhang
Copy link
Contributor

@HuaizhengZhang HuaizhengZhang commented Aug 24, 2024

User description

Before submitting this PR, please make sure you have:

  • confirmed all checks still pass OR confirm CI build passes.
  • verified that any code or assets from external sources are properly credited in comments and/or in
    the credit file.

PR Type

enhancement


Description

  • Improved user prompts to provide clearer instructions for resuming steps and providing requirements.
  • Updated step descriptions to better reflect the actions being performed by various agents.
  • Enhanced debugging status messages to specify the role of the MLE Debug Agent.

Changes walkthrough 📝

Relevant files
Enhancement
baseline.py
Improve user interaction and step descriptions in baseline workflow

mle/workflow/baseline.py

  • Improved user prompts for clarity.
  • Updated step descriptions for better understanding.
  • Enhanced debugging status messages.
  • +8/-6     

    💡 PR-Agent usage:
    Comment /help on the PR to get a list of all available PR-Agent tools and their descriptions

    @HuaizhengZhang HuaizhengZhang self-assigned this Aug 24, 2024
    @dosubot dosubot bot added the size:S This PR changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. label Aug 24, 2024
    Copy link

    PR Reviewer Guide 🔍

    ⏱️ Estimated effort to review: 2 🔵🔵⚪⚪⚪
    🧪 No relevant tests
    🔒 No security concerns identified
    ⚡ Key issues to review

    String Formatting
    The string formatting in line 37 might cause a runtime error if cache is not a string. Ensure cache is converted to string or use a different method to format the message.

    Copy link

    github-actions bot commented Aug 24, 2024

    PR Code Suggestions ✨

    CategorySuggestion                                                                                                                                    Score
    Enhancement
    Ensure user input is within a valid range before processing

    Add a check to ensure that the user input for 'step' is within the valid range
    before converting it to an integer.

    mle/workflow/baseline.py [36-40]

     step = ask_text(f"MLE has finished the following steps: \n{cache}\n"
                     "You can pick a step from 1 to {cache} to resume\n"
                     "(or ENTER to continue the workflow)")
    -if step:
    +if step and 1 <= int(step) <= cache.current_step():
         step = int(step)
     
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 9

    Why: This suggestion adds a necessary validation step to ensure user input is within a valid range, preventing potential runtime errors and improving robustness.

    9
    Standardize the check for debugging status to be case insensitive

    Refactor the debugging loop to handle the 'is_debugging' condition more robustly by
    converting the string to lowercase.

    mle/workflow/baseline.py [98-100]

    -if is_debugging == 'true' or is_debugging == 'True':
    +if is_debugging.lower() == 'true':
         with console.status("MLE Debug Agent is executing and debugging the code..."):
             debug_report = debugger.analyze(code_report)
     
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 8

    Why: This suggestion standardizes the check for the debugging status by making it case insensitive, which increases the robustness of the condition check.

    8
    Improve user input handling for requirements

    Replace the direct use of 'ask_text' with a validation loop to handle empty or
    invalid inputs more gracefully.

    mle/workflow/baseline.py [58-61]

    -ml_requirement = ask_text("Please provide your requirement")
    -if not ml_requirement:
    -    print_in_box("The user's requirement is empty. Aborted", console, title="Error", color="red")
    -    return
    +while True:
    +    ml_requirement = ask_text("Please provide your requirement")
    +    if ml_requirement:
    +        break
    +    print_in_box("The user's requirement cannot be empty. Please provide a valid input.", console, title="Error", color="red")
     
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 7

    Why: The suggestion improves user input handling by ensuring that a valid requirement is provided, enhancing user experience and preventing premature termination of the function.

    7
    Possible bug
    Improve string formatting for clarity and correctness

    Replace the string interpolation with a formatted string to avoid potential type
    errors and improve readability.

    mle/workflow/baseline.py [36-38]

     step = ask_text(f"MLE has finished the following steps: \n{cache}\n"
    -                "You can pick a step from 1 to {cache} to resume\n"
    +                f"You can pick a step from 1 to {len(cache)} to resume\n"
                     "(or ENTER to continue the workflow)")
     
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 8

    Why: The suggestion correctly identifies a potential issue with string formatting and improves it by using the length of the cache, which enhances both readability and correctness.

    8

    @HuaizhengZhang HuaizhengZhang requested review from huangyz0918 and removed request for huangyz0918 August 26, 2024 01:16
    @dosubot dosubot bot added the lgtm This PR has been approved by a maintainer label Aug 26, 2024
    @huangyz0918 huangyz0918 merged commit 4fd49ca into main Aug 26, 2024
    4 checks passed
    Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
    Labels
    enhancement New feature or request lgtm This PR has been approved by a maintainer Review effort [1-5]: 2 size:S This PR changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files.
    Projects
    None yet
    Development

    Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

    3 participants