docker step

[ildyria]

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Chores

  • Enabled multi-architecture Docker builds (linux/amd64, linux/arm64) and added CI steps for QEMU setup and registry login to support multi-arch publishing.
  • Enhanced image metadata handling and automated publishing flow for consistent tags and registry authentication.

• Documentation

  • Added upgrade notice for v7.0, updated deployment image references and navigation links, and adjusted header/formatting for clarity.

_{✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.}

[coderabbitai]

Caution

Review failed

The pull request is closed.

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

Updates enable multi-architecture Docker builds and DockerHub publishing, add OCI metadata to images, and adjust README content; also remove public/Lychee-front from CI path-ignore rules.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Summary
CI/CD Workflow .github/workflows/CICD.yml	Removed public/Lychee-front from path-ignore lists; added QEMU setup step before Buildx; added DockerHub login step; expanded image metadata inputs to include both the repository and ghcr.io/${{ github.repository }}; added multi-platform targets linux/amd64 and linux/arm64; clarified latest tag handling in flavor config.
Dockerfile metadata Dockerfile	Added multiple OCI image labels (title, description, authors, vendor, URL, documentation, licenses, base image name) to base and production stages; build/runtime steps unchanged.
Documentation README.md	Removed Docker shield line; added Lychee 7.0 upgrade notice and link; replaced Docker image reference with Lychee container page URL; updated wording and symbols in several links and headings; adjusted branch/edge wording.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 3 (Moderate) | ⏱️ ~25 minutes

Poem

🐰 I hopped through workflows late at night,
Puffed up QEMU and set platforms right.
Labels stacked tidy on each Docker layer,
README polished with gentle care.
DockerHub doors swing open — what a sight!

Pre-merge checks

✅ Passed checks (1 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

---

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between d2a7af0 and 4a70c7b.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)

• Dockerfile
• README.md

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 90.11%. Comparing base (bf38642) to head (4a70c7b).
⚠️ Report is 11 commits behind head on avoid-race-condition.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.