Skip to content

Conversation

@LuisJG8
Copy link
Owner

@LuisJG8 LuisJG8 commented Jan 22, 2026

No description provided.

@LuisJG8 LuisJG8 merged commit 7c166cc into MyProjects Jan 22, 2026
1 check failed
@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Contributor

Summary of Changes

Hello @LuisJG8, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request introduces foundational changes aimed at enhancing the robustness and efficiency of data processing by moving towards an idempotent queue system. It includes a minor adjustment to the GitHub API rate limit handling and, more significantly, lays the groundwork for splitting large data retrieval tasks into smaller, more manageable, and idempotent units. This will help ensure that operations can be safely retried without unintended side effects and potentially improve processing speed.

Highlights

  • API Rate Limit Adjustment: The GitHub API rate limit check in get_github_data has been adjusted to trigger at 4900 calls instead of 4990, providing a slightly earlier stop to prevent exceeding the limit.
  • New Idempotent Task Placeholder: A new Celery task, get_more_data, has been introduced as a placeholder. This task is intended to split larger data retrieval operations into smaller, idempotent, and faster chunks, aligning with the goal of an 'idempotent queue'.

🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request introduces a new placeholder Celery task get_more_data and adjusts the rate limit check threshold in the get_github_data function. The change in the rate limit check uses a magic number, which could lead to maintainability issues. The new task is currently empty, indicating incomplete functionality.

remaining = remaining_api_calls[0]

if int(counter) == 4990:
if int(counter) == 4900:
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

high

The change from 4990 to 4900 for the rate limit check uses a magic number. It's generally better to define such thresholds as named constants to improve readability and maintainability. If the intention is to stop a certain number of calls before the actual rate_limit[1], this value should ideally be derived from rate_limit[1] to be more robust against changes in the API's total rate limit. For example, rate_limit[1] - 100 if the goal is to stop 100 calls before the limit.

Suggested change
if int(counter) == 4900:
if int(counter) == rate_limit[1] - 100:

Comment on lines +170 to +173
# split the task above into small chunks to make it idempotent and faster
@app.task
def get_more_data():
pass
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

The get_more_data task is currently a placeholder with just pass. While the comment indicates future plans for idempotency and speed, an empty task can be misleading or suggest incomplete work. It would be better to either implement some initial logic or, if it's not ready, consider removing it for now to avoid deploying incomplete features. If it's a planned future enhancement, a TODO comment might be more appropriate within the function body.

Suggested change
# split the task above into small chunks to make it idempotent and faster
@app.task
def get_more_data():
pass
# split the task above into small chunks to make it idempotent and faster
@app.task
def get_more_data():
# TODO: Implement logic to split the main task into smaller, idempotent chunks
pass

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant