Repository navigation
Inheriting from a generic class, which uses an annotated table definition causes fields to get lost #3443
Description
How are you using the lua-language-server?
NeoVim
Which OS are you using?
Windows
What is the issue affecting?
Annotations, Type Checking
Expected Behaviour
--- (field) Specific.value: string
hover(t.value)Actual Behaviour
--- (field) Specific.value: unknown
hover(t.value)Reproduction steps
---@class GenericSuper<T> : { value: T }
---@class Specific : GenericSuper<string>
---@type Specific
local t
hover(t.value)Then hover on t.value
Additional Notes
Interestingly this seems to only affect inheriting from table constructor. When converting it into a field, it works as expected:
---@class GenericSuper<T>
---@field value T
---@class Specific : GenericSuper<string>
---@type Specific
local t
--- (field) Specific.value: string
hover(t.value)Log File
No response
Activity
[-]Inheriting from generic defined as table does not add field to subclass[/-][+]Inheriting from a generic class, which uses a annotated table definition causes fields to get lost[/+][-]Inheriting from a generic class, which uses a annotated table definition causes fields to get lost[/-][+]Inheriting from a generic class, which uses an annotated table definition causes fields to get lost[/+]