-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 16
33287: Support domain APIs #13
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
- support for drop, get
- support for create, save - complete modeling of ConditionalFormat, Domain, PropertyDescriptor, and PropertyValidator - all models serialize/deserialize json
- "python test/test_security.py"
- add typings for public experiment methods
# Create a list domain | ||
################### | ||
list_domain_definition = { | ||
'kind': 'IntList', # or 'VarList' |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Should we have a page on .org at the API level which documents all of the domains which can be created with this api and what the domain kind optional params are.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, we should also have API tests (in java?) for all the ones that we state we support.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Even better would be an API endpoint that would describe to users the available types and the associated optional parameters.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
changes look good, Cory should review as well since he will be working on the R API piece.
Nick and I met last week to discuss this and he gave me a tour of the changes in this pull request at that time. I agree that it will be a good reference as we do the work for the Rlabkey package. |
No description provided.