Add identical hostnames tests for desired behavior

testsuite/tests/singlecluster/identical_hostnames/test_identical_hostnames_auth_on_gw_and_route_desired.py

@@ -0,0 +1,53 @@
+"""
+Tests desired behavior of using one HTTPRoute declaring the same hostname as parent Gateway related to AuthPolicy.
+https://github.com/Kuadrant/kuadrant-operator/blob/main/doc/auth.md#limitation-multiple-network-resources-with-identical-hostnames
+(see second topology mentioned there). This test should start passing once the policy-2 affects the route-b which is
+considered to be desired behavior.
+"""
+
+import pytest
+
+from testsuite.policy.authorization.auth_policy import AuthPolicy
+
+pytestmark = [pytest.mark.kuadrant_only]
+
+
+@pytest.fixture(scope="class", autouse=True)
+def authorization2(request, gateway, blame, openshift, label):
+    """2nd 'deny-all' Authorization object"""
+    auth_policy = AuthPolicy.create_instance(openshift, blame("authz2"), gateway, labels={"testRun": label})
+    auth_policy.authorization.add_opa_policy("rego", "allow = false")
+    request.addfinalizer(auth_policy.delete)
+    auth_policy.commit()
+    auth_policy.wait_for_ready()
+    return auth_policy
+
+
+@pytest.mark.issue("https://github.com/Kuadrant/kuadrant-operator/issues/431")
+@pytest.mark.xfail(
+    reason="Currently the Gateway-attached Policy is ignored so 200 (OK) is returned instead of 403 (Forbidden)"
+)
+def test_identical_hostnames_auth_on_gw_and_route_enforced(client, authorization):
+    """
+    Tests that Gateway-attached AuthPolicy is successfully enforced on 'route2' even if both 'route' and 'route2'
+    declare identical hostname and there is another AuthPolicy already successfully enforced on 'route'.
+    Setup:
+        - Two HTTPRoutes declaring identical hostnames but different paths: '/anything/route1' and '/anything/route2'
+        - Empty AuthPolicy enforced on the '/anything/route1' HTTPRoute
+        - 'deny-all' AuthPolicy (created after Empty AuthPolicy) enforced on the Gateway
+    Test:
+        - Send a request via 'route' and assert that response status code is 200
+        - Send a request via 'route2' and assert that response status code is 403 (it is expected to fail)
+    """
+
+    # Verify that the Empty AuthPolicy is still enforced despite 'deny-all' AuthPolicy being enforced too now
+    authorization.wait_for_ready()
+
+    # Access via 'route' is allowed due to Empty AuthPolicy
+    response = client.get("/anything/route1/get")
+    assert response.status_code == 200
+
+    # Access via 'route2' should be forbidden due to 'deny-all' Gateway-attached AuthPolicy
+    # However, this is currently expected to fail
+    response = client.get("/anything/route2/get")
+    assert response.status_code == 403

testsuite/tests/singlecluster/identical_hostnames/test_identical_hostnames_on_routes_desired.py

@@ -0,0 +1,93 @@
+"""
+Tests desired behavior of using two HTTPRoutes declaring the same hostname using both AuthPolicy and RateLimitPolicy.
+https://github.com/Kuadrant/kuadrant-operator/blob/main/doc/auth.md#limitation-multiple-network-resources-with-identical-hostnames
+https://github.com/Kuadrant/kuadrant-operator/blob/main/doc/rate-limiting.md#limitation-multiple-network-resources-with-identical-hostnames
+(see the first topology mentioned in both links).
+For AuthPolicy, the test should start passing once the policy-2 is enforced on route-b
+For RateLimitPolicy (RLP) the test should start passing once the policy-1 is effectively enforced on route-a
+"""
+
+import pytest
+
+from testsuite.policy.authorization.auth_policy import AuthPolicy
+from testsuite.policy.rate_limit_policy import Limit, RateLimitPolicy
+
+pytestmark = [pytest.mark.kuadrant_only]
+
+
+@pytest.fixture(scope="class")
+def authorization2(request, route2, blame, openshift, label):
+    """2nd Authorization object"""
+    auth_policy = AuthPolicy.create_instance(openshift, blame("authz2"), route2, labels={"testRun": label})
+    auth_policy.authorization.add_opa_policy("rego", "allow = false")
+    request.addfinalizer(auth_policy.delete)
+    auth_policy.commit()
+    auth_policy.wait_for_accepted()
+    return auth_policy
+
+
+@pytest.fixture(scope="module")
+def rate_limit(rate_limit):
+    """Add limit to 1st RateLimitPolicy allowing 1 request per 10 minutes (a.k.a. '1rp10m' RateLimitPolicy)"""
+    rate_limit.add_limit("1rp10m", [Limit(1, 10)])
+    return rate_limit
+
+
+@pytest.fixture(scope="class", autouse=True)
+def rate_limit2(request, route2, blame, openshift, label):
+    """2nd RateLimitPolicy allowing 2 requests per 10 minutes (a.k.a. '2rp10m' RateLimitPolicy)"""
+    rlp = RateLimitPolicy.create_instance(openshift, blame("2rp10m"), route2, labels={"testRun": label})
+    request.addfinalizer(rlp.delete)
+    rlp.add_limit("2rp10m", [Limit(2, 10)])
+    rlp.commit()
+    rlp.wait_for_ready()
+    return rlp
+
+
+@pytest.mark.issue("https://github.com/Kuadrant/kuadrant-operator/issues/431")
+@pytest.mark.xfail(reason="Currently the 2nd AuthPolicy fails with: AuthScheme is not ready yet, see issue 431, Tier2")
+def test_identical_hostnames_auth_on_routes_enforced(client, authorization2):
+    """
+    Tests that 2nd AuthPolicy is enforced on 'route2' declaring identical hostname as 'route' with another
+    AuthPolicy already successfully enforced on 'route'.
+    Setup:
+        - Two HTTPRoutes declaring identical hostnames but different paths: '/anything/route1' and '/anything/route2'
+        - Empty AuthPolicy enforced on the '/anything/route1' HTTPRoute
+        - 2nd 'deny-all' AuthPolicy (created after Empty AuthPolicy) accepted on the '/anything/route2' HTTPRoute
+    Test:
+        - Assert that 'deny-all' AuthPolicy is enforced (expected to fail)
+    """
+
+    # 2nd 'deny-all' AuthPolicy should be enforced, this is expected to fail currently
+    assert authorization2.wait_for_ready()
+
+    # Access via route2 should be forbidden due to enforced 'deny-all' AuthPolicy, this is expected to fail currently
+    response = client.get("/anything/route2/get")
+    assert response.status_code == 403
+
+
+@pytest.mark.issue("https://github.com/Kuadrant/kuadrant-operator/issues/431")
+@pytest.mark.xfail(reason="2nd RLP wins currently whereas 1st RLP should win to be consistent with AuthPolicy behavior")
+def test_identical_hostnames_rlp_on_routes_1st_wins(client, rate_limit):
+    """
+    Tests that 1st RateLimitPolicy stays enforced on 'route' declaring identical hostname as 'route2' when another
+    RateLimitPolicy gets successfully enforced on 'route2'.
+    Setup:
+        - Two HTTPRoutes declaring identical hostnames but different paths: '/anything/route1' and '/anything/route2'
+        - '1rp10m' RateLimitPolicy enforced on the '/anything/route1' HTTPRoute
+        - '2rp10m' RateLimitPolicy (created after '1rp10m' RateLimitPolicy) enforced on the '/anything/route2' HTTPRoute
+    Test:
+        - Assert that 1st '1rp10m' RateLimitPolicy is enforced
+        - Send a request via 'route' and assert that 429s (Too Many Requests) are returned (this is expected to fail)
+    """
+
+    # Verify that the '1rp10m' RLP is still enforced despite '2rp10m' RLP being enforced too now
+    rate_limit.wait_for_ready()
+
+    # Access via 'route1' is limited by 1st '1rp10m' RLP hence the first request is 200 (OK)
+    response = client.get("/anything/route1/get")
+    assert response.status_code == 200
+
+    # This is currently expected to fail because 1st '1rp10m' RLP is actually not enforced despite its status saying so
+    response = client.get("/anything/route1/get")
+    assert response.status_code == 429